This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Paul, I started this reply to your request some time ago... I just found that I never sent my comments -- too many other things came up in the interim (like the COD NOAAPort ingest move to Ubuntu); sorry! re: > You know much about what we are doing. We are also planning on running a > plethora of dual-pol images and generate them for web use. Our IT > department wants to run VM servers. I do not know how to answer the > questions Dave asks below. Any help is greatly appreciated. Hmm... It is my experience that generating web content from McIDAS-X processing is not that big of CPU user. Having said that, however, I do not routinely generate LOTS of images for web use. Are you thinking about generating a GIF/JPEG for each dual-pol product for each station producing dual-pol products for every reporting period? If yes, this certainly is a LOT of images. Some questions: - have you captured any metrics that would help quantify the problem at hand: - how many images need to be created every hour - the length of time it takes to create an image for each NEXRAD site for a single product My gut feeling is that McIDAS running in a sufficiently ample virtual machine could produce all of the plots that you need/want. The environment I run in almost 100% of the time anymore is a CentOS 6.2 x86_64 VMware virtual machine running on my Dell Studio 14 (I7, 8 GB ram) laptop that is running Windows 7. I dedicate 2 GB and 2 cores to the virtual machine, and I never experience any hiccups performance-wise. In fact, this is my primary McIDAS development environment anymore. The fact that I can build the full Unidata McIDAS-X/-XCD/-XRD distribution in about 11 minutes in this environment is one pretty good measure of how fast it is. I have generated a series of GIF images from satellite displays, but the overhead was so small that I don't remember much about it (if it had been slow, I _would_ have remarked to myself that the environment was not really ready for "prime time"). I don't know if the above helps at all. Please keep me informed about what directions COD is heading in compute-wise. > To: address@hidden > Subject: Re: [DATA:] I need some reasoning for servers for weather > > Paul, what I need from what you can give me now is some justification of > the processing power needed. Because upper management wants to move > everything to VM to consolidate costs and harddrive usage, I need to show > both why we are using this much otherwise they keep saying its a webserver > basically and we have our websites running off of vm. Gil gave me the data > numbers of data/hour/day type of stats, but what I need to know is the > justification for such powerful processors. Why can we not limit our data > processing and run it off a dual processor. I don't know all what you guys > are doing nor what you have planned in the future. Too many things on my > plate now as it is with other things like wireless, firewall issues, and > the CIS department complaining that their service here is not up to par for > their way of doing things. > > ============================ > Dave Bukowski -- NREMT-B > BLS Instructor (CPR & AED) > N9KPD > http://davebb.deviantart.com/ > address@hidden > address@hidden > > > address@hidden> wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > > > > Also Gil, maybe you can answer this one or Tyler can. How much data do > >>> we > >>> ingest in a single day and how much is scourted (estimate on the scour). > >>> > >> > >> Climate: > >> > >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/**cgi-bin/rtstats/rtstats_** > >> summary_volume?climate.cod.edu<http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/rtstats_summary_volume?climate.cod.edu> > >> > >> Weather: > >> > >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/**cgi-bin/rtstats/rtstats_** > >> summary_volume?weather.cod.edu<http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/rtstats_summary_volume?weather.cod.edu> > >> > >> CDstats: > >> > >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/**cgi-bin/rtstats/rtstats_** > >> summary_volume?cdstats.cod.edu<http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/rtstats_summary_volume?cdstats.cod.edu> > >> > > > > NOAAport (incomplete/low due to less than great reception of data): > > > > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/**cgi-bin/rtstats/rtstats_** > > summary_volume?noaaport.cod.**edu<http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/rtstats_summary_volume?noaaport.cod.edu> > > > > > > **************************************************************** > > ******************* > > Gilbert Sebenste > > ******** > > (My opinions only!) ****** > > Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University **** > > E-mail: address@hidden > > *** > > web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu ** > > Twitter: > > http://www.twitter.com/NIU_**Weather<http://www.twitter.com/NIU_Weather> > > ** > > Facebook: > > http://www.facebook.com/niu.**weather<http://www.facebook.com/niu.weather> > > * > > **************************************************************** > > ******************* Cheers, Tom -- **************************************************************************** Unidata User Support UCAR Unidata Program (303) 497-8642 P.O. Box 3000 address@hidden Boulder, CO 80307 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unidata HomePage http://www.unidata.ucar.edu **************************************************************************** Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: IKW-702363 Department: Support McIDAS Priority: Normal Status: Closed