This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: "Dan A. Dansereau" <address@hidden> >Organization: USU >Keywords: 200305201449.h4KEnaLd000625 McIDAS-X 2002 Hi Dan, >I am attempting to trak down a problem that I'm having with mcidas on >the tru64/dec alpha system. I have started with a clean install with the >latest version in a clean/new directory. The install completes with >no compile errors This sounds promising so far :-) >to the configuring the micidas account, after doing >the REDIRECT MAKE ( with the LOCAl.NAM ) the following happens: > >When I type >DMAP AREA >I get the following output > >DMAP AREA >PERM SIZE LAST CHANGED FILENAME DIRECTORY >---- --------- ------------ -------- --------- >-rw- 9341360 Apr 01 16:20 AREA9000 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 1503728 Apr 01 16:21 AREA9010 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 1503728 Apr 01 16:21 AREA9011 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 1543904 Apr 01 16:23 AREA9012 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 1003728 Apr 01 16:23 AREA9013 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 1003728 Apr 01 16:24 AREA9014 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 897680 Apr 01 16:24 AREA9015 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 608288 Apr 01 16:25 AREA9016 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 565512 Apr 01 16:25 AREA9017 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 311008 Apr 01 16:25 AREA9018 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 714288 Apr 01 16:26 AREA9019 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 768 Nov 25 1996 AREA9982 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 768 Nov 25 1996 AREA9983 /home/mcidas/data >-rw- 2816 Jun 02 1998 AREA9995 /home/mcidas/data >19001304 bytes in 14 files > >which looks ok; I agree, this looks good. >when I type LA 9000 9019 I get this: One quick comment: programs like LA, DF, and others are being sunset. They were removed from the SSEC distribution of McIDAS about three years ago, and my documentation encourages users to move away from their use as quickly as possible. >LA 9000 9019 > area ss yyyddd hhmmss lcor ecor lr er zr lsiz esiz z bands > ---- ---- ------ ------ ----- ----- -- -- -- ----- ----- - ----- > 9000 11 96001 0 1 3 1 1 1 2160 4320 1 1........> > 9010 11 96001 0 101 151 1 1 1 1000 1500 1 1........> > 9011 11 96001 0 2899 4000 8 8 1 1000 1500 1 1........> > 9012 11 96001 0 51 1 4 4 1 1232 1252 1 1........> > 9013 11 96001 0 -9999 0 20 20 1 1000 1000 1 1........> > 9014 11 96001 0 -9999 0 20 20 1 1000 1000 1 1........> > 9015 11 96001 0 -29 1 1 1 1 700 1280 1 1........> > 9016 11 96001 0 2806 9049 8 16 1 700 864 1 1........> > 9017 11 96001 0 2494 7961 8 16 1 666 844 1 1........> > 9018 11 96001 0 5539 8040 8 8 1 480 640 1 1........> > 9019 11 96001 0 91 89 4 4 1 592 1204 1 1........> >Done > >again I think this is OK; however Yes, this looks good. The "correct" (new) way to do this is: BATCH TOPOADDE.BAT DSINFO IMAGE TOPO Dataset Names of Type: IMAGE in Group: TOPO Name NumPos Content ------------ ------ -------------------------------------- CONF 1 North America (Conformal) GLOB 1 Global (Mercator) GOESE 1 GOES-East (75W) GOESW 1 GOES-West (135W) MDR 1 US Radar projection MERC 1 North America (Mercator) MOLL 1 Global (Mollweide) NPOLE 1 Northern Hemisphere QUAD 1 NW Quadrasphere SPOLE 1 Southern Hemisphere WHEMI 1 Western Hemisphere DSINFO -- done IMGLIST TOPO/ALL.ALL Image file directory listing for:TOPO/ALL Pos Satellite/ Date Time Center Band(s) sensor Lat Lon --- ------------- ------------ -------- ---- ---- ------------ 1 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 0 0 1 11 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 40 105 1 12 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 45 105 1 13 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 0 100 1 14 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 -90 105 1 15 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 90 105 1 16 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 0 0 1 17 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 23 71 1 18 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 25 138 1 19 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 40 98 1 20 TOPOGRAPHY 1 JAN 96001 00:00:00 26 100 1 IMGLIST: done >when I type >DF 9011 1 AY 0 0 -3 EU=TOPO SF=yes The "correct" way of doing this is now: IMGDISP TOPO/CONF MAG=-3 EU=TOPO Beginning Image Data transfer, bytes= 170228 IMGDISP: loaded frame 1 IMGDISP: done EU: Restoring TOPO.ET to frame(s)= 1 EU: Done >I get the following: > >DF 9011 1 AU 0 0 -3 EU=TOPO SF=YES >BEGIN TV LOAD PROCESSING FOR FRAME 1 >Processing completed for frame= 1 > >But no image on the screen, I just ran this command on our Compaq Tru64/OSF1 5.1 system using Unidata McIDAS v2002 and did get the display on the screen with no problem. It is possible that you somehow toggled your image display off. Try toggling the display using the ALT-K toggle. Does the image appear? >if I follow this with a >MAP NA >it draws the NA map on the screen. OK, this says that the navigation has correctly been written to the frame directory and that MAP can use it correctly. This looks good. >I think that I have followed the directions on the web site >right down to the letter - but I remeber getting a image at this >step on the prior release. Hmm... The directions for testing McIDAS v2002 are different from what your are doing above. In the v2002 instructions: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/packages/mcidas/2002/mcx/test_mcx.html users are advised to create the TOPO dataset (using DSSERVE) and loading an image using IMGDISP. Is it possible you are looking at the testing instructions from an older version of McIDAS? >So - Is this a problem, or can I ignore it and go on?? I would say that your system _should_ be able to display images loaded using DF, because my test system is. I would recommend, however, that you follow the procedures in the v2002 testing page above as that tests the supported portions of the distribution. Please let me know if you continue to have problems on that Tru64 machine. On another note, I see that USU is running LDM-6.0.10 on climatemine.ser.usu.edu, but your main IDD node allegan is still running LDM-5. You will not get the benefit of LDM-6 until you upgrade allegan since it is that machine that is getting the data off of the IDD for your site. Is there anything we can do to help you upgrade to the most recent LDM release (which is now 6.0.11) on allegan? Tom