This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: Don Murray <address@hidden> >Organization: UCAR/Unidata >Keywords: 200304171342.h3HDg47U007471 Don, >I have not heard back from MUG on my request for calibration >unit definitions. Is it that hard of a question? Do you >know the answer? I don't know the answer off of the top of my head, but I could slog through the code to find the answer. >We are doing a release of the IDV and I was hoping to include >support for all known calibration units, but I need the answer >to my previous question. Should I contact MUG again? I would contact Dave Santek directly. He will be the one that will answer anyway. The response may be slow since SSEC is in the midst of testing/development for the v2003 release which is scheduled for the second week in May. >From address@hidden Mon Apr 14 08:08:28 2003 > >Hi- > >I'm working on the java ADDE stuff and am trying to >support calibration info for an image request. In looking >through the kbx modules, I came across the following >unit specs: > >MW** >WM** > >I'm guessing the latter is W/m2, but want to confirm >that MW** is mW/m**2/ster/cm**-1. Is that milliWatts >for the first unit spec? (I got this from kbxgms.dlm) >(Also, note that the "official" abbreviation for >steradian is "sr", not "ster"). > >Also, in kbxmods.dlm, WM** is the unit for RAD and >MW** is the unit for RADN. What's the difference >between these two quantities? > >Thanks. >Don Tom >From address@hidden Thu Apr 17 10:44:21 2003 Tom- Unidata Support wrote: > > I don't know the answer off of the top of my head, but I could > slog through the code to find the answer. I slogged through a lot of the code, but only found something in kbxgms.dlm for part of the answer. > I would contact Dave Santek directly. He will be the one that > will answer anyway. The response may be slow since SSEC is > in the midst of testing/development for the v2003 release > which is scheduled for the second week in May. I figured that might be the case, but it should be a quick answer. I'll contact Dave directly. Thanks. Don >From address@hidden Fri Apr 18 08:06:32 2003 Hi Don, Sorry for the delay in response. There was a mixup about who was responding to you. Per Dave Santek: "These abbreviations are contained in the routine clabel.for: IF (CUNIT.EQ.'WP**') THEN CLABEL='Watts/meter**2/steradian' ELSE IF(CUNIT .EQ. 'MW**') THEN CLABEL='milliwatts/meter**2/steradian/(cm-1)' ELSE IF(CUNIT .EQ. 'WM**') THEN CLABEL='watts/meter**2/steradian/micron' RussD should be able to help with the RAD & RADN differences [found in kbxmods.dlm]." This is inquiry 12079. >From address@hidden Fri Apr 18 08:20:39 2003 Hi- mug wrote: > Sorry for the delay in response. There was a mixup about who was > responding to you. Okay. > Per Dave Santek: > > "These abbreviations are contained in the routine clabel.for: > > * IF (CUNIT.EQ.'WP**') THEN > CLABEL='Watts/meter**2/steradian' > ELSE IF(CUNIT .EQ. 'MW**') THEN > CLABEL='milliwatts/meter**2/steradian/(cm-1)' > ELSE IF(CUNIT .EQ. 'WM**') THEN > CLABEL='watts/meter**2/steradian/micron'* > > RussD should be able to help with the RAD & RADN differences [found in > kbxmods.dlm]." > > This is inquiry 12079. Thanks. I guess I didn't grep on enough source files. I only looked at *.f and *.dlm. Should have checked *.for also. Don