[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20030417: calibration units (redux)
- Subject: 20030417: calibration units (redux)
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:31:03 -0600
>From: Don Murray <address@hidden>
>Organization: UCAR/Unidata
>Keywords: 200304171342.h3HDg47U007471
Don,
>I have not heard back from MUG on my request for calibration
>unit definitions. Is it that hard of a question? Do you
>know the answer?
I don't know the answer off of the top of my head, but I could
slog through the code to find the answer.
>We are doing a release of the IDV and I was hoping to include
>support for all known calibration units, but I need the answer
>to my previous question. Should I contact MUG again?
I would contact Dave Santek directly. He will be the one that
will answer anyway. The response may be slow since SSEC is
in the midst of testing/development for the v2003 release
which is scheduled for the second week in May.
>From address@hidden Mon Apr 14 08:08:28 2003
>
>Hi-
>
>I'm working on the java ADDE stuff and am trying to
>support calibration info for an image request. In looking
>through the kbx modules, I came across the following
>unit specs:
>
>MW**
>WM**
>
>I'm guessing the latter is W/m2, but want to confirm
>that MW** is mW/m**2/ster/cm**-1. Is that milliWatts
>for the first unit spec? (I got this from kbxgms.dlm)
>(Also, note that the "official" abbreviation for
>steradian is "sr", not "ster").
>
>Also, in kbxmods.dlm, WM** is the unit for RAD and
>MW** is the unit for RADN. What's the difference
>between these two quantities?
>
>Thanks.
>Don
Tom
>From address@hidden Thu Apr 17 10:44:21 2003
Tom-
Unidata Support wrote:
>
> I don't know the answer off of the top of my head, but I could
> slog through the code to find the answer.
I slogged through a lot of the code, but only found something
in kbxgms.dlm for part of the answer.
> I would contact Dave Santek directly. He will be the one that
> will answer anyway. The response may be slow since SSEC is
> in the midst of testing/development for the v2003 release
> which is scheduled for the second week in May.
I figured that might be the case, but it should be a quick answer.
I'll contact Dave directly.
Thanks.
Don
>From address@hidden Fri Apr 18 08:06:32 2003
Hi Don,
Sorry for the delay in response. There was a mixup about who was
responding to you.
Per Dave Santek:
"These abbreviations are contained in the routine clabel.for:
IF (CUNIT.EQ.'WP**') THEN
CLABEL='Watts/meter**2/steradian'
ELSE IF(CUNIT .EQ. 'MW**') THEN
CLABEL='milliwatts/meter**2/steradian/(cm-1)'
ELSE IF(CUNIT .EQ. 'WM**') THEN
CLABEL='watts/meter**2/steradian/micron'
RussD should be able to help with the RAD & RADN differences [found in
kbxmods.dlm]."
This is inquiry 12079.
>From address@hidden Fri Apr 18 08:20:39 2003
Hi-
mug wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in response. There was a mixup about who was
> responding to you.
Okay.
> Per Dave Santek:
>
> "These abbreviations are contained in the routine clabel.for:
>
> * IF (CUNIT.EQ.'WP**') THEN
> CLABEL='Watts/meter**2/steradian'
> ELSE IF(CUNIT .EQ. 'MW**') THEN
> CLABEL='milliwatts/meter**2/steradian/(cm-1)'
> ELSE IF(CUNIT .EQ. 'WM**') THEN
> CLABEL='watts/meter**2/steradian/micron'*
>
> RussD should be able to help with the RAD & RADN differences [found in
> kbxmods.dlm]."
>
> This is inquiry 12079.
Thanks. I guess I didn't grep on enough source files. I only
looked at *.f and *.dlm. Should have checked *.for also.
Don