This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: "Anderson, Alan C. " <address@hidden> >Organization: St. Cloud State >Keywords: 200209232129.g8NLTo103996 McIDAS-X mcscour Hi Alan, >I think I sent the message just below around 1 Oct, but it must have >gotten lost. It includes additional information & questions regarding >data scouring on our site. I must apologize for not jumping on this one. I will work on this today. >Regarding the above issue, I have changed the scouring for MD and GRID files >as you described above. In the meantime, I cleaned up the disk so we are >stil running at about 50% disk usage. > >Regarding our setup, our laboratory terminals access the data on our >ingest machine, waldo, which runs the ldm and mcidas decoders. Since we >are still running on MCIDAS 7.705, we need an NFS mount to waldo for each >or our terminals, and waldo is also listed as the ADDE site for all the >dataset types. My understanding is that while much of the data is accessed >through the ADDE listing, some MCIDAS commands in this version (7.705) still >need the NFS mount. I don't know whether the AREA files are accessed by >ADDE or through NFS, but you do. Would it be possible to get the login information for a non-'mcidas' user on a machine other than waldo? This way, I could refresh my memory as to what was not there in v7.705. (After all, 7.705 _is_ three revisions ago, and I am getting old :-) >If I read your release message correct, installing ver 2002 >will mean that the NFS mount is no longer necessary. I can only say this with assurity after I see and understand the setup on a machine that is currently accessing data on waldo through NFS. >Regarding composites, we do use these, and I don't think we would like to >give them up. I guess this means we are interested in a parallel setup. >Does this mean we keep two copies of the file ? Yes, but this is not as bad as it seems. The process for creating the composites relies on the McIDAS routing table, ROUTE.SYS. The routing table uses pre-ADDE concepts for access of data files (by file number, not by ADDE dataset group/descriptor). So, in order to keep compositing the GOES-East and GOES-West images (and topography), waldo will need to keep ingesting the GOES-East and GOES-West VIS, IR, and WV images using routing table concepts. Now, it only has to keep one of each, so the disk usage is not nearly as bad as it sounds. >That may not be a problem >as we have disk space, especially if it can be on another machine. I don't think that disk space will be a problem. >Also, as I noted earlier, we will want to run GEMPAK fairly soon, a little >later this year, so we would like to plan for that. Got it. My intention is to setup image ingestion/decoding/filing in a manner that will be immediately useful for GEMPAK. Setting up other decoding for GEMPAK (point data and grids, for instance) is something that has to be done by the person that installs GEMPAK. >Given the above, you are welcome to look and or change things on waldo; >Let me know if you need the pw, perhaps you still have it. I have the login to waldo. I really do want a login to a user account on a machine other than waldo so I can really see how McIDAS is being used now. For instance, are you still using the Fkey menu? >If this adjustment would all be much simpler after we have upgraded to >ver 2002, then let me know. We can try and speed that up. It would be easier to work with IF folks are using the MCGUI. If the Fkey menu is still being used actively, I am not sure what the outcome of upgrading would be (it shouldn't be much of anything, but I don't want to state that categorically without getting a better idea of how users are working). >I would like to know the details of what needs to change; perhaps there >is a section in the ldm and/or MCIDAS docs you can point me to Changing how the images are ingested/decoded/filed is not a separate section of the McIDAS documentation mainly because I have not developed a truely clean way of creating the composites without the routing table concepts. The pqact.conf actions for decoding and filing the images in a manner to be used by GEMPAK are provided with the current ldm-mcidas distribution (v7.8.0) in the ldm-mcidas-pqact.conf file. These actions take advantage of the flexibility of the ldm-mcidas PNG compressed AREA decoder, pnga2area. >Thanks Tom As soon as I get the separate "student" login, I will examine the best way to upgrade your image decoding. Tom