[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20020905: McIDAS-X 7.8, wxcore.prd
- Subject: 20020905: McIDAS-X 7.8, wxcore.prd
- Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 10:29:27 -0600
>From: "Fingerhut, William A" <address@hidden>
>Organization: Lyndon State
>Keywords: 200209051345.g85DjmZ18927 McIDAS WXCORE.PRD
Hi Bill,
>I came across a minor error in the WXCORE.PRD file in mcidas 7.8, and
>thought it couldn't hurt to let you know.
Please keep these reports coming in!
>The entry for NGM_OUTPUT_EASTUS is close, but not right.
>WMO=FOUS60-64 should be WMO=FOUE60-64 or FOUE not FOUS.
You are right, of course. Not only that, but it appears that the
partitioning of information in WXCORE.PRD is redundantly incorrect.
Consider these entries:
ETA_OUTPUT WMO=FOUS60-79 WSTN=KWNO
NGM_OUTPUT WMO=FOUS80-90 WSTN=KWNO
These look OK on the surface, but what about these:
NGM_OUTPUT_EASTUS WMO=FOUS60-64 FOUS80 WSTN=KWNO KWNO
NGM_OUTPUT_CENTUS WMO=FOUS65-71 FOUS81-82 WSTN=KWNO KWNO
NGM_OUTPUT_WESTUS WMO=FOUS72-73 FOUS83 WSTN=KWNO KWNO
It seems to me that this is saying that the partitioning of FOUSxx headers
is the same for ETA_OUTPUT and NGM_OUTPUT_xxxxUS. Do you agree?
>There may be other, similar errors; I have not checked it carefully.
I am _sure_ that there are more errors. The reason I am sure is that
there is nobody actively looking at the product headers and adjusting
WXCORE.PRD entries. This is why I say: _please_ keep those observations/
corrections coming!
>Take care, Bill
Talk to you later...
Tom