[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

20020619: comparing NEXRCOMP/1KN0R-NAT against RTNEXRAD/N0R image (cont.)

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: 20020619: comparing NEXRCOMP/1KN0R-NAT against RTNEXRAD/N0R image (cont.)
  • Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:46:34 -0600
>From: Unidata Support <address@hidden>
>Organization: UCAR/Unidata
>Keywords: 200206181745.g5IHj0605982 McIDAS NEXRCOMP RTNEXRAD

Tom,

Sorry, I should have included this in the last email.  The images I was
using for comparison between the NEXRCOMP/1KN0R STA=BYX and
RTNEXRAD/N0R ID=BYX STA=BYX loads can be seen in:

http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/tom/gifs/nexrcompbyx.gif
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/tom/gifs/rtnexradbyx.gif

As you can see, the images I am comparing are a lot different than the
ones that you sent along.  The ones I looked at yesterday were equally
similar to each other even though there was 15 minutes difference in
their times.

Later...

Tom