This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: "Jeff Wilson" <address@hidden> >Organization: ABoM >Keywords: 200106140756.f5E7ujp19614 McIDAS-X FreeBSD Jeff and Steve, >I was at a conference last week with Steve Dixon from our Tas office. He is >interested in getting McIDAS running under freebsd. I think he may have >already contacted you sometime ago about this. He is interested in what >changes you added to mccomp and mccar and any memory management changes you >had to do. There were several mods made to add support FreeBSD in the Unidata McIDAS distribution. For reference, I think that I folded most if not all of these changes into the SSEC 7.8 distribution (seeing as how I have CVS access to the code). >Could you drop us a note with these please. Here are snippits from the CHANGES.770 file I send out with my McIDAS 7.7 distribution that note what changes were made (there is no real explanation of the changes, however). mcar.sh SSEC 7.70 version with mods don't return error if mcar run with no objects added section for FreeBSD modified ranlib entry for Linux mccomp.sh SSEC 7.70 version with mods added sections for FreeBSD modified SSEC sections for Linux added section to trap Sun SC4.0 compilation bug added section to trap Sun SC5.0 compilation bug added passing of loader flag for stripping executables for IRIX and IRIX64 commented out the removal of the executable when doing a new link tclcomp.sh SSEC 7.70 version with mods added section for DEC OSF/1, FreeBSD, and Linux for RUNTIME_PATH mct_obuf.c SSEC 7.70 version with mod changed if REGEXEC_STRSTR to if defined(REGEXEC_STRSTR) for FreeBSD mct_winc.c SSEC 7.70 version with mod added ifdef to include ncurses.h for FreeBSD decoder.cp SSEC 7.70 version with mods changed sigset call to signal for Linux; NOTE: not tested, but decoder is only used for SDI boxes defined MAP_FAILED to be ((void *) -1) for OSF/1 included if !defined(__FreeBSD__) with Linux netcdf/configure SSEC 7.70 bundled version with mods netcdf/configure.in incorporated Plymouth St. (Koermer) mods for FREEBSD Changed occurrances of -Ff2cFortran to -Df2cFortran argutil.c SSEC 7.702 version with mod added include of ctype.h in FREEBSD ifdef I have put the 7.7 modules that were changed for BSD support into the compressed tar file freebsdmods.tar.Z and put it into the pub/mcidas/bsd directory of anonymous FTP on our FTP server, ftp.unidata.ucar.edu. One should be warned that the modules included have changes for other reasons in addition to the BSD changes. Again, one of my objectives was to get the SSEC distribution into shape for supporting FreeBSD so that sites like TAS can go ahead and build and run there. This does not mean, however, that SSEC will be providing official support for the platform. >Alternatively I >didn't end up getting the current user name and password & machine to pick >up the unidata distribution so he could then do a build of that, or at least >pick it to bits to see what you have done. Here is the access information: machine: ftp.unidata.ucar.edu user: ... pass: ... directory: unix/770 file: mcidasx770.tar.Z I have started putting together my 7.8 distribution, but it is not yet ready to go. >Steve was also the person telling me about the differences between linux and >freebsd and why freebsd is better. He reminded me at the conference but we >did not get into detail. It sounded like a popular fast food outlet. Linux >has a monolithic kernel whilst freebsd doesn't. If I remember what Steve >said correctly this means that linux can end up with a bottle neck when >accessing the hardware if things are slow, apparently freebsd doesn;t have >this problem. I am sure Steve will be able to fill us in on the details if I >have totally misquoted him :) These brief comments seem to go along with the general observation that FreeBSD is faster than Linux. I have to say, however, that my attempts at installing and configuring FreeBSD at home were not as successful as my installations of various versions of RedHat Linux. This is most likely due to my growing familiarity with Linux over the past 3 years. Talk to you later... Tom