[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
19990309: grdinfo and MRF grids
- Subject: 19990309: grdinfo and MRF grids
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 13:28:38 -0700
>From: weather <address@hidden>
>Organization: NMSU/NSBF
>Keywords: 199903090301.UAA21398 McIDAS GRID MRF
Robert,
Sorry I didn't get to this sooner.
>I have figured out a way to create text forecasts soundings using grdinfo
>and sed. The problem I discovered is in the MRF. The spacing of the
>grid points for Z is much greater than for T or other variables and
>specifically SPD and DIR which I am producing.
It is possible that you are looking at Z in one projection and the
other parameters in a different projection?
>I cannot determine
>from the documentation if this is the way it should be.
If the grids are the same (meaning same projection), then the spacing
should be the same for the MRF.
>The command below
>run from DERIVE=SPD UNIT=KT produces many more grid points. I don't
>have this problem with the ETA or Alaskan ETA.
>
>
>GRDINFO RTGRIDS/MRF LIST TIME=12 LEV=850 PARAM=Z UNIT=FT FORMAT=I7.2 LAT=63 68
>LON=143 150
>Listing data from Z Grid at 850 MB from MRF at 120000 UTC on 1999067
> from dataset: RTGRIDS/MRF
> Column Row Latitude Longitude Value Units Level Param
> 28 38 64.459 150.000 4241 FT 850 MB Z
> 29 38 66.803 143.660 4347 FT 850 MB Z
>GRDINFO Done, Number of grids listed=1
>GRDINFO - done
I ran the exact same invocation of GRDINFO and got the same kind of results:
GRDINFO RTGRIDS/MRF LIST TIME=12 LEV=850 PARAM=Z UNIT=FT FORMAT=I7.2 LAT=63 68
LON=143 150
Listing data from Z Grid at 850 MB from MRF at 120000 UTC on 1999071
from dataset: RTGRIDS/MRF
Row Col Latitude Longitude Value Units Level Param
38 28 64.459 150.000 3920 FT 850 MB Z
38 29 66.803 143.660 4060 FT 850 MB Z
GRDINFO Done, Number of grids listed=1
GRDINFO - done
I believe that the listing is telling us that the grids are different
since the Column and Row are not the same.
Am I missing something here?
Tom
>From address@hidden Fri Mar 12 13:56:03 1999
Of course, I forgot! The projections must be different. I should really
file the same projections in the same file.
By the way, we received our 333Mhz Sparc from EIS computers. The
compilers should arrive Monday, it looks pretty darn fast right now,
but we will see how how long it take to compile McIDAS.
Thanks,
Robert