This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Tony, > From Unidata website ( > https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/ldm/ldm-current/basics/pqact.conf.html#STDIOFILE) > I found: > The STDIOFILE action tells the pqact process to write the data-product to a > file using the (buffered) fwrite() function. In general, this is more > efficient than the FILE action but risks loosing data if the computer > crashes. > > This seems to say STDIOFILE should be the more efficient of the two but > with the risk of data loss. Am I misinterpreting this? No, you're not misinterpreting. That was how my late LDM predecessor explained it. I no longer accept that the efficiency claim is true, however. Can you perform the test? Regards, Steve Emmerson Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: ISX-930596 Department: Support LDM Priority: Normal Status: Closed =================== NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.