[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[LDM #DIS-670629]: Fwd: Beta LDM to test?

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [LDM #DIS-670629]: Fwd: Beta LDM to test?
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:21:16 -0600
Gilbert,

It looks like the modification I made to verify the entries in the GEMPAK 
parameter tables doesn't like "Missing" entries:

~/Projects/ldm/etc$ fgrep Missing g2varswmo.tbl
000 001 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 002 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 003 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 004 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 005 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 006 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 007 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 013 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 014 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 015 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 016 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 017 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 018 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 019 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 020 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 190 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
000 191 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
001 000 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
001 001 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
001 002 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
002 000 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
002 003 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.0
002 004 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
003 000 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
003 001 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
010 000 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
010 001 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
010 002 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
010 003 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
010 004 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00
010 191 255 000 Missing                                                         
       0  -9999.00

I'll see what can be done.

> Mike Zuranski at the College of DuPage graciously let me test LDM 6.13.7.22
> on noaaport1.cod.edu, a satellite ingester. Unfortunately, while it started
> up fine,
> I quickly noticed an issue as seen in the log file ldmd.log. See attached
> photo; it looks like a GEMPAK table error of some sort.

Regards,
Steve Emmerson

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: DIS-670629
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed
===================
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata 
inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web.  If 
you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must 
let us know in each email you send to us.