This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Bob, > Thanks for the information. I do reconcile the queue/latency with "decrease > maximum latency" as my reconciliation mode on all LDM servers. On the > downstream server, the registry has my max latency as 685s. The "pqmon -S" > has my minimum residence time as 2300s. With that being in order, am I > correct in assuming that retransmission of the same product is my problem? Given that your maximum acceptable latency is less than your minimum residence time, then your problem is that products are being retransmitted after a time interval that's greater than your minimum residence time; consequently, the products no longer exist in the queue and are being accepted. > If a retransmitted product is the same as another copy is sitting in queue > (with only a different sequence number), does it follow that the sequence > number must actually be part of the product's data and therefore part of the > checksum -- otherwise it would be rejected? The sequence number is part of a data-product's metadata and isn't used to compute the checksum. The problem is the time between retransmissions is greater than the minimum residence time. The solution would be to increase the minimum residence time beyond the retransmission time-interval by either increasing the queue-size parameters or decreasing the amount of data going into the queue. > Bob Regards, Steve Emmerson Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: TUN-623089 Department: Support LDM Priority: Normal Status: Closed