[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[LDM #MNK-989154]: comparing, contrasting two ldm servers
- Subject: [LDM #MNK-989154]: comparing, contrasting two ldm servers
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:00:05 -0600
SJ,
> > - what are the sizes of the LDM queues on your old and new machines?
>
> new -
> [measwx:os/darwin/bin] ldm% pqmon -S
> 1 500002816 500002816 499650128 122070 66996 4681 68 0 19 499839008 8610
>
> [measwx:os/darwin/bin] ldm% pqmon -i 5
> Aug 22 14:04:50 pqmon NOTE: Starting Up (5167)
> Aug 22 14:04:50 pqmon NOTE: nprods nfree nempty nbytes maxprods
> maxfree minempty maxext age
> Aug 22 14:04:50 pqmon NOTE: 6024 2 116044 480665360 66996
> 871 55073 12593920 95
> Aug 22 14:04:55 pqmon NOTE: 6303 1 115766 498033040 66996
> 871 55073 1969776 100
>
> old
> [flightrisk:realtime/gempak/acft] ldm% pqmon -i 5
> Aug 22 14:29:37 pqmon NOTE: Starting Up (25365)
> Aug 22 14:29:37 pqmon NOTE: nprods nfree nempty nbytes maxprods
> maxfree minempty maxext age
> Aug 22 14:29:37 pqmon NOTE: 10958 3 86695 399973944 68456
> 990 29197 20888 286
> Aug 22 14:29:42 pqmon NOTE: 10996 1 86659 399935088 68456
> 990 29197 67984 290
The ages of the oldest data-product in the product-queues are dangerously low.
It's possible that products are being deleted from the queue before pqact(1)
has a chance to process them. You can verify this by searching the LDM log
files for the string "Processed oldest product in queue".
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: MNK-989154
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed