This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Dan, > Double-checked the paths, but saw the same thing. > > [ldm_test@sys18 ~]$ whoami > ldm_test > [ldm_test@sys18 ~]$ which ldmping > /usr/local/ldm_test/bin/ldmping > > [ldm_test@sys18 ~]$ /usr/local/ldm_test/bin/ldmping -i0 > Jan 31 20:45:56 INFO: State Elapsed Port Remote_Host > rpc_stat > Jan 31 20:45:56 INFO: Resolving localhost to 127.0.0.1 took 0.000355 seconds > [ldm_test@sys18 ~]$ > [ldm_test@sys18 ~]$ /usr/local/ldm_test/bin/ldmping -i0 147.81.80.185 > Jan 31 20:46:11 INFO: State Elapsed Port Remote_Host > rpc_stat > Jan 31 20:46:11 INFO: RESPONDING 0.001313 388 147.81.80.185 Actually, you didn't see the same thing. Only the "ldm" user's ldmping(1) utility indicated that it connected to an LDM server. > Now for both the ldm user and the ldm_test user they are set to the same IP > 147.81.80.185. So that when the ldmping is running it passed that IP. Is > that a problem? Having the same IP address isn't a problem because of the different port numbers. > Thanks > Dan Regards, Steve Emmerson Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: NUP-437021 Department: Support LDM Priority: Normal Status: Closed