This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Gilbert, > Because you get this when compiling against LDM 6.9.8: > > mv -f .deps/lib_la-cfltbop.Tpo .deps/lib_la-cfltbop.Plo > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile c89 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. > -DLDMHOME='"/home/ldm"' -I.. -I../g2 -I/home/ldm/include -DNDEBUG -O -m64 > -MT lib_la-cfltinq.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/lib_la-cfltinq.Tpo -c -o > lib_la-cfltinq.lo `test -f 'cfltinq.c' || echo './'`cfltinq.c > c89 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DLDMHOME=\"/home/ldm\" -I.. -I../g2 > -I/home/ldm/include -DNDEBUG -O -m64 -MT lib_la-cfltinq.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/lib_la-cfltinq.Tpo -c cfltinq.c -fPIC -DPIC -o > .libs/lib_la-cfltinq.o > In file included from geminc.h:51, > from cfltinq.c:1: > /usr/include/sys/ipc.h:25:3: warning: #warning "Files using this header > must be compiled with _SVID_SOURCE or _XOPEN_SOURCE" > cfltinq.c:4:17: error: ldm.h: No such file or directory > make[1]: *** [lib_la-cfltinq.lo] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ldm/noaaport-1.7.0/gempak' > make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 > > > Shrug. > > Back to 6.9.7 I go with the NOAAport server. 6.9.8 everywhere else. > > Wait, you haven't even released the announcement yet? > > Good. Now you can do 6.9.8.1. :-) And in a subsequent email: > By screwing my brain back on after reminding myself I should have > done a ln -s ldm-6.9.8. Never mind. All is well, close this > ticket please. All my servers are on 6.9.8 now, and working > fine. I'm glad to hear that LDM 6.9.8 is working for you because I rushed its release in order to accommodate the upcoming LDM workshop. The issue of the LDM and NOAAPORT packages playing together is somewhat contentious. Because the NOAAPORT package depends so much on the LDM package, I favor making the NOAAPORT package a subpackage of the LDM (though disabled by default). Others want them to be less coupled -- something that I think increases the burden on the developer and is very difficult to get right. Time will tell. > ******************************************************************************* > Gilbert Sebenste ******** > (My opinions only!) ****** > Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University **** > E-mail: address@hidden *** > web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu ** > ******************************************************************************* Regards, Steve Emmerson Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: JMF-751783 Department: Support LDM Priority: Normal Status: Closed