[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[LDM #NGQ-500529]: ldm questions

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [LDM #NGQ-500529]: ldm questions
  • Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:20:10 -0600
Paul,

> Yes, the problem started when the LDAD was upgraded as part of the AWIPS 
> OB9.1 installation.
> The operating system was upgraded from Redhat 4.2 to 5.2, and the AWIPS 
> software was upgraded. We haven't found anyone yet to specify the exact 
> changes but are speculating the security was upgraded with the new OS.
> 
> | Who can we talk to about the upgrade?
> 
> Still looking for this one.
> 
> Question: Does the LDM "config.log" file indicate the environment our version 
> of LDM was installed in? Specifically the "config.log" file I looked at on 
> our LDAD box shows a uname -r = 2.6.9-55.0.2.ELsmp.
> On the LDAD box uname -r = 2.6.18-92.el5. I'm wondering if the version of LDM 
> that was dumped onto the LDAD is not entirely compatible with the OS 
> environment currently on the LDAD machine?

The output of "ldmadmin config" indicates the current version of the O/S.

An operating-system upgrade shouldn't affect the installed LDM system, but, as 
we know, the god of the way things should be is a very minor god.  :-)  It 
couldn't hurt to re-build and re-install the LDM.  Start with a "make 
distclean".

> Paul Wahner
> Spaceflight Meteorology Group
> Johnson Space Center
> Houston, TX
> 281-244-6409

Regards,
Steve Emmerson

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: NGQ-500529
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed