[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20050912: LDM 64-bit system question
- Subject: 20050912: LDM 64-bit system question
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:42:39 -0600
>From: "Smith, Matt" <address@hidden>
>Organization: UAH/NASA
>Keywords: 200509121841.j8CIfPnX011148
Hi Matt and Michael,
> I have a question that I need to pass by you - regarding a new system
>here to replace the aging Dell we have as our LDM machine. You may
>remember talking to Michael McEniry while Gerry and I were up there?
Yup.
>He's one of our SysAdmins...
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>
>We have a Dell PowerEdge 2850 with dual 3 GHz Xeon "Nocona"
>processors, which allegedly have "extended memory 64-bit
>technology" (EM64T).
We have several of these boxes here at the UPC.
>Right now, it's running stock Red Hat
>Enterprise Linux 3 (AS, update 5, for i386), with packages
>kernel-2.4.21-32.0.1.EL and glibc-2.3.2-95.33.
OK.
>What should we do for LDM product queues larger than 2 GB on
>this computer?
Even though you could build an LDM that would support queues up
to 4 GB on this machine, I recommend upgrading to RHEL 4 or
Fedora Core 3 64-bit. You not only get true 64-bit support, but
the Linux 2.6 kernel as well.
>Should we use a different edition of RHEL?
Yes.
>Should we use a different distribution of Linux?
We use Fedora Core at the UPC. When we get questions from
Debian users, we have to stretch to understand what is going on.
>Do you know what software we can run to verify that this computer
>supports the proper 64-bit instruction set?
Sorry, no. Dell should be able to confirm that the processors in
your box actually EM64T.
Cheers,
Tom
--
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the
Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available
through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made
available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.