This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: Michael McEniry <address@hidden> >Organization: UAH >Keywords: 200508101508.j7AF88jo023528 LDM pqact pqinsert Michael and Matt, re: >We had an odd occurrence with pqact. Here are the relevant >log entries: > >> * Aug 08 07:18:24 ldm pqact[1845]: 46004110 20050808071819.946 EXP 000 >> UAH-NAMAW12-05080806-05080809 > >> * Aug 08 07:32:14 ldm pqact[1845]: 46004110 20050808071819.946 EXP 000 >> UAH-NAMAW12-05080806-05080809 > >It looks like pqact "noticed" the same product twice. Since >each log entry has the same pqact process ID, I assume pqact >was not restarted in between entries. > >We're running LDM 6.1.0, and using pqinsert (as a user other >than ldm, but in group ldm) to add files to the local >product queue. The product was inserted exactly once, as far >as we can tell, especially since the entries show the same >insertion timestamp. > >What might cause this odd behavior? We haven't noticed it >happen any other time. Steve Emmerson, our LDM developer will get back to you with an authoritative answer on this when he returns from travel. In order to help us troubleshoot this unusual occurrance, please provide us with details on the machine running the LDM: operating system (with rev level), compilers used to build the LDM, etc. Also, please tell us how large your LDM queue is and give us some idea of the size of the products you are inserting and the frequency at which you are inserting them. Also, please include the output of pqmon. One thought that comes to mind is that the product is, in fact, being inserted into the queue more than once and the second (third, etc.) insertion is being made after the original product has been scoured from the queue. In a case like this, one would expect pqact to be run again since the product would look new/unique as far as the LDM is concerned. >From address@hidden Wed Aug 10 09:33:15 2005 >... I need to correct the last statement from Michael... The situation >described happens a lot - dozens of times a day. >Matt Smith >Information Technology & Systems Center >University of Alabama in Huntsville >at the National Space Science and Technology Center >320 Sparkman Dr. >Huntsville, AL 35805 >ph 256-961-7809 fax 256-961-7859 >e-mail address@hidden If this is one of the machines participating in the SURA SCOOP project then I am under the impression that the products that are being inserted into the queue are large. If the size of the products being inserted are large relative to the size of the queue, then one can expect that products previously inserted will be scoured to make room for new ones. As soon as a product is flushed from the queue, a reinsertion into the queue will not be blocked since there will be no product in the queue with the same MD5 checksum. Cheers, Tom -- NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.