[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20050429: LDM - Binaries available?
- Subject: 20050429: LDM - Binaries available?
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 17:33:28 -0600
Scott,
>Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 15:09:41 -0800
>From: "Scott Swank" <address@hidden>
>Organization: NOAA/NWS
>To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: 20050429: LDM - Binaries available?
>Keywords: 200504291922.j3TJMbKx001883
The above message contained the following:
> I have solved this problem, and have run across a new one.
>
> Example: ldmadmin watch shows me that 5 products came in, but my script
> is only executed on say (in this case) 2 of them. I have added that
> -wait to the pqact.conf file, but I'm still seeing this problem.
> Suggestions on where to look?
>
> ie:
> (ldmadmin watch snippet)
> May 03 23:02:06 pqutil: 118 EXP 000 METAR_vrh_.88569.123230028
> May 03 23:02:36 pqutil: 1780 EXP 000 METAR_vrh_.88594.123230108
> May 03 23:02:36 pqutil: 123 EXP 000 METAR_vrh_.88595.123230108
> May 03 23:02:36 pqutil: 1850 EXP 000 METAR_vrh_.88598.123230108
> May 03 23:02:36 pqutil: 125 EXP 000 METAR_vrh_.88599.123230108
>
> (logfile generated when the EXEC portion of my pqact.conf is called)
> Arguments: /apps/decoders/ldm_metar.ksh METAR_vrh_.88569.123230028
> Arguments: /apps/decoders/ldm_metar.ksh METAR_vrh_.88599.123230108
I don't think the above two entries were generated by the LDM system.
Do you know what utility created them?
> You can see that the files with 88594, 88955, and 88598 didn't get
> processed even though they have the same naming convention and are
> inserted by the same process on the 6.3 machine.
Does this happen if you replace
EXP ^(METAR)
EXEC -wait /apps/datatools/runDecoder.ksh
with, for example,
EXP ^(METAR.*)
PIPE -close /apps/datatools/metarDecoder.ksh \1
The above is more efficient than using an EXEC entry in the pqact(1)
configuration-file coupled with a script that uses pqcat(1) to obtain
the desired data-product. It would require, however, that the script be
rewritten to read the data-product from standard input rather than use
pqact(1).
> Thanks,
> Scott
Regards,
Steve Emmerson