[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20050217: LDM and Firewall
- Subject: 20050217: LDM and Firewall
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:37:24 -0700
Waldenio,
>Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:22:22 -0300
>From: Waldenio Almeida <address@hidden>
>Organization: INPE/CPTEC
>To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: 20050217: LDM and Firewall
The above message contained the following:
> Here at cptec whe have 2 networks with LDMs.
> In the 150.163.141.* the 388 port is free in-out,
> but in 150.163.146.* the ports are free only for
> out.
>
> So, a downstream LDM can be behind a firewall,
> where only it will start the connections ?
Yes. The downsteam LDM will connect to port 388 on the upstream computer
to create a TCP connection to the upstream LDM.
> If the upstream starts a connection, the firewall
> block it. will the upstream start any connection ?
Normally, the upstream LDM will not create (start) any connections
(except to its upstream LDM-s, of course).
The ldmsend(1) and ldmping(1) utilities, however, do act like upstream
LDM-s and do create a TCP connection to port 388 on the downstream LDM.
The rpcinfo(1) utility can also be used to connect from an upstream
computer to port 388 on a downstream computer. If you don't use these
utilities, then it should be OK for the firewall to block packets
destined for port 388 on the 150.163.146.* subnet.
Note, however, that the ldmping(1) and rpcinfo(1) utilities are useful
for troubleshooting an LDM network. Also, the LDM has proven itself to
be very secure: I know of no instance where an LDM listening on port 388
was used to hack-into a computer. So the firewall could safely allow
packets destined for port 388 on the 150.163.146.* subnet.
OK?
Regards,
Steve Emmerson