[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LDM Failover Configuration
- Subject: LDM Failover Configuration
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:54:03 -0600
Kathy,
>Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:41:57 -0400
>From: Kathy Carusone <address@hidden>
>Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory
>To: address@hidden
>Subject: LDM Failover Configuration
>Keywords: 200406141537.i5EFbZtK014545
The above message contained the following:
> Jami Casamento recommended I contact you regarding configuring LDM
> clients to failover to a secondary server. At MIT Lincoln Laboratory, we
> have been using LDM for a few years to acquire and feed NEXRAD Level II
> data to/from CRAFT, for our Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS)
> project.. We have direct connections to 26 NEXRADs and provide the data
> over Internet II to CRAFT. We also acquire 10 Level II feeds from CRAFT
> With the changes in the NWS configuration, we will be transitioning to
> ingesting more than we feed. With this added reliance on CRAFT for our
> data, we have arranged to be able to acquire data from either CRAFT or
> the NWS MD server.
We call the NWS MD server "The MAX".
> I have been reading LDM configuration info, and saw comments on the pros
> and cons of redundant REQUEST entries for duplicate feeds, but I am not
> sure that is how I should set it up. It may not be unreasonable for us
> to have to do a "hard switch" from one server to another. Any
> information or hints you can provide would be appreciated!
I'm not sure what you mean by a "hard switch".
Do you have sufficient networking bandwidth that you can afford to have
two incoming data-feeds for the same data?
> Kathy
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Kathy Carusone
> MIT Lincoln Laboratory
> Lexington, MA 02420
>
> address@hidden
> (781)981-5039
Regards,
Steve Emmerson