This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Rita, >Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:25:24 -0500 >From: Rita Edwards <address@hidden> >Organization: UCAR/Unidata >To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden> >Subject: Re: 20031016: LDM 6.0.14 connection to portmap on RedHat 9 The above message contained the following: > However, the upgraded system flash is not able to get through > the firewall. With the firewall guys monitoring the firewall, > Carl's machine flash attempted a connection to branch. To the LDM or to the portmapper? > The > firewall reported that after the initial connection, flash sent > branch a fin packet (closing the connection), and then > reattempted to connnect to branch using a higher level port. To the LDM or to the portmapper? > This connection is viewed as a new connection on a higher > level port number and is not allowed. Does rpcinfo(1) show that Branch's LDM is registered on port 388, e.g., $ rpcinfo -p motherlode.ucar.edu program vers proto port service 100000 4 tcp 111 rpcbind 100000 3 tcp 111 rpcbind 100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind 100000 4 udp 111 rpcbind 100000 3 udp 111 rpcbind 100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind 300029 6 tcp 388 ldmd 300029 5 tcp 388 ldmd Regards, Steve Emmerson