[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

20030224: ldm 6.0 release candidate install?

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: 20030224: ldm 6.0 release candidate install?
  • Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:28:48 -0700
>From: Jeff Masters <address@hidden>
>Organization: Weather Underground
>Keywords: 200212102220.gBAMK9423807 IDD LDM6

Hi Jeff,

>Hi Tom et al, I was trying to install the latest version of ldm 6.0 you
>told me about, but ran into these compilation errors on my linux 2.4.18
>slackware machine:
>
>binstats.o: In function `ldmsend_statsbin':
>/usr/local/ldm/runtime/src/rtstats/binstats.c:188: undefined reference to
>`ldm_version'
>ldmsend.o: In function `ldmsend':
>/usr/local/ldm/runtime/src/rtstats/ldmsend.c:412: undefined reference to
>`ldm_version'
>/usr/local/ldm/runtime/src/rtstats/ldmsend.c:464: undefined reference to
>`ldm_version'
>collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>make[2]: *** [rtstats] Error 1
>make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.0.0.18/src/rtstats'
>make[1]: *** [subdir_target] Error 1
>make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.0.0.18/src'
>make: *** [rtstats/install] Error 2
>
>was there a binary I was supposed to grab?

If you grabbed ldm-6.0.0.17 or ldm-6.0.0.18, you should drop back to
ldm-6.0.0.16.  17 had a configure problem tht 18 solved, but 18
introduced a problem with the ldm_version stuff.  Steve is working on a
new release candidate that should solve this and one more problem that
shows up on FreeBSD and OSF/1 (Tru64) systems.  Since he is sick,
however, I can't say when this may be available for testing.

Tom