[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: advice needed for feedtype and product identifiers
- Subject: Re: advice needed for feedtype and product identifiers
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:56:38 -0700
Hi Joe,
Sorry to be so unresponsive, but we've got an all-consuming 2-day
Unidata Users Committee meeting going on right now. I got your phone
message yesterday, but haven't had time to look into it yet.
> ATD is going to try to use LDM to send various data sets for the IHOP
> project.
>
> We need advice on what feedtypes and product identifiers to use for
>
> 1) S-Pol radar data in DORADE sweepfile format
> 2) Composite gridded radar data in netCDF format.
>
> I suppose I can start testing using the 'EXP' feed type, but if there is
> a better naming convention, please let me know.
The current feedtype assignments are available at:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/packages/ldm/feedtypes/index.html
but I don't believe there is anything better than "EXP" to use for
now. Product identifiers are completely up to you, with the following
guidelines:
- product IDs should be shorter than 255 bytes (KEYSIZE in
protocol/ldm.h)
- product IDs should be designed for regular expression pattern
matching and extraction of information with substring matching
- make sure the product ID contains all the info needed to route the
product or to act on it with pqact.conf entries
- don't use tabs or newlines in the product IDs (but spaces OK)
- make your IDs unique enough that they are unlikely to clash with
other products using the EXP feed type. Typically this is done
with a short unique prefix on product IDs. (This may not be an
issue if you are not on a network where other EXP products may
appear.)
There may be some better guidelines for product IDs; I'll look around
as soon as I get a little spare time.
--Russ