This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
=============================================================================== Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ =============================================================================== ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:01:35 -0400 From: address@hidden To: Jessica Thomale <address@hidden> Subject: Re: NOAAPort data server x86 configuration I thought I would share my experience with linux. I have not done much with Solaris so I can't compare. I built a Dual PII 450 linux computer about 2 years ago now running Linux Mandrake 6.0. This machine ingest all of the NOAAPORT feed via LDM and works as a web server and produces thousands of WXP gif images per day. It has been rock solid, and would have an uptime of well over a year, except that I have moved it a few times. In the last few weeks I have ordered and put together (2) Dual PIII 800 MHZ systems running Linux Mandrake 7.1, I have elected to use the tried and true BX chipset on the motherboard. Again I have had no problems, very stable with heavy load in the 6-10 range at times. Below I've cut and pasted my P.O for the hardware I used to build the 2 computers. This gives you an idea of pricing, again for 2 systems. Prices may be a little cheaper since these are a few weeks old. Dual PIII 800MHZ SCSI, 512MB ECC RAM, 36GB HD Description Item Number Qty Unit Price Ext Price -------------- -------------- ---- ------------ ------------ ASUS P2BDS SLOT-1 BX MB122 2 413.95 827.90 Intel PIII 800E 256K Retail CP100 4 264.95 1059.80 256MB ECC 168-Pin, PC100 ME421 4 317.95 1271.80 Intel EthrExp Pro/100 PCI NE010 2 42.95 85.90 BTC 52x EIDE CD-ROM CD100 2 36.95 73.90 AGP Matrox G400 16MB VC200 2 85.95 171.90 Super 701-A, ATX Mid Tower CS104 2 77.95 155.90 92mm CASE FAX w/Y-Cable CSF01 2 9.00 18.00 IBM Ultrastar 36.4GB 10K RPM HD209 2 649.95 1299.90 -------------- $4965.00 Robert Mullenax gov> cc: address@hidden Sent by: bcc: owner-ldm-users@unidat Subject: Re: NOAAPort data server x86 configuration a.ucar.edu 10/10/2000 02:19 PM We have a Gateway PII 400 Mhz that is running the LDM, McIDAS, and GEMPAK decoders, and serves as a workstation and web server. We are running Solaris. I would definitely recommend Solaris over Linux for ease of administration, and compatibility. Informal observations here indicate that while Linux is faster than Solaris at light loads, with top-end hardware and heavy loads Solaris wins out. The only problem with Solaris is that the hardware support is poor. You really have to look at the hardware compatibility list thoroughly to make sure each component is compatible. Dell claims their PowerEdge servers have been tested with Solaris, with the addition of an updated Adpatec SCSI driver. Here's what I would recommend as a minimum: Dual 600Mhz PIII's (Dell's minimum PowerEdge 2400 has dual 733's) 512MB RAM 18GB-10K rpm Ultra 160 SCSI --OS and software 36GB-10K rpm Ultra 160 SCSI--data (if you want some archival ability) 36GB Ultra 160 disks are down to around $600 now. Quite frankly, while we have been happy with the Gateway, we find that our Sun UltraSparc 440 clone performs much better under heavy load than the Intel machine, and our next one will be a Sparc. I am sure you'll get a lot of opposing views on the Solaris vs. Linux issue.. but I have tried both and Solaris handily wins out overall. Hope this helps. Robert Mullenax ----------------------------------------------------- Click here for Free Video!! http://www.gohip.com/free_video/