[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 20000824: ldmsend problem
- Subject: Re: 20000824: ldmsend problem
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:15:08 -0500 (CDT)
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Robb Kambic wrote:
> David,
>
> The ldmsend doesn't have the robustness of a LDM server, it's a one time
> shot deal. If a packet is missing or something, then it fails. I would
> recommend using pqinsert, that puts the product into the local queue and
> therefore has the robustness of the LDM server, ie if necessary to resend
> the product. I speculate that the problem you are seeing is that the
> network conditions have deteriorated to the point that some packets are
> missings or the acknowledgement take to long to be returned.
>
>
Hmmm.. thanks for the info. I hadn't realized that it was
non-reliable. Network connection seems to be fine...just
ran some tests. Machine load seems to be higher than normal
though so that might account for it.
Running a whole ldm server is overkill for what I'm trying
to do. ldmsend was more lightweight. I had to move output
from a program that would only run on a certain machine to
our main data server and ldmsend seemed like an easy way.
(NFS cross mounting was not possible in this case for
various reasons.)
Actually, now I only need to use that data anymore on the
machine it is generated on, so I'm just keeping it local now.
Thanks for the helpful info.
--------------------------------------------------------
David Wojtowicz, Sr. Research Programmer/Systems Manager
Department of Atmospheric Sciences Computer Services
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
email: address@hidden phone: (217)333-8390
--------------------------------------------------------