[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 19990210: DIFAX not processing
- Subject: Re: 19990210: DIFAX not processing
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 13:07:46 -0700 (MST)
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Mark Tucker wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Robb Kambic wrote:
>
> >
> > > many duplicate entries that we've had. The old pqact.conf file handles
> > > the incoming DIFAX correctly; the new one does not. There are only two
> > > entries that deal with DIFAX (listed below).
> > >
> > > # DIFAX feed from Alden
> > > DIFAX ^(....).* FILE -overwrite -close
DIFAX ^(....).*
FILE -overwrite -close
> > > /usr/local/ldm/data/apollo/rawdifax/\1.g3
> > > #DIFAX ^(....).* EXEC /usr/local/ldm/scripts/remote.difax \1
> > > DIFAX ^(....).* EXEC /usr/local/ldm/scripts/process.difax \1
DIFAX ^(....).*
EXEC /usr/local/ldm/scripts/process.difax \1
> >
> > As use ldm, run your new script from ldm home. ie
> >
> > % cd ~
> > % /usr/local/ldm/scripts/process.difax <difaxName>
> >
> > This will probably show the problem.
> >
> Robb,
>
> The script "process.difax" works correctly when the difax products are
> being processed. With the updated pqact.conf the previous entry that
> outputs the rawdifax to a file was not writing either.
Mark,
This is strange, so it makes me believe that something is wrong with the
pqact.conf file. I will modify the above entries, use these as a
template for you mods. It could be an extra space at the end of a line or
something small causing the problem. This type of error would not show up
in the ldmadmin pqactcheck because it's not a syntax error.
Robb...
In looking things
> over from this weekend I found that there were several products that were
> not being processed although they were coming in (I could see them using
> the "ldmadmin watch" command).
>
> > > I believe that the duplicate entries may have been creating some minor
> > > problems so I don't want to restore the old version if at all possible.
> > > For reference, I've kept the last pqact.conf to work with the DIFAX as
> > > "pqact.conf.keep" in the same directory. I know I'm missing something
> > > here but I'm at a loss at to what it might be. I couldn't find anything
> > > in the archives that mention a similar problem.
>
> Because we were missing so much data over this past weekend I had to
> restore the original pqact.conf from pqact.conf.keep (we were missing
> products that still had a pqact.conf entry). I kept a copy of
> the cleaned up version as pqact.conf.new. I still need to get this
> corrected at some point.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mark Tucker
> Information Technology
> Lyndon State College
> address@hidden
>
>
===============================================================================
Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================