[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20000824: Strange ROUTE entries after sounder data
- Subject: 20000824: Strange ROUTE entries after sounder data
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:01:25 -0600
>From: Thomas Mote <address@hidden>
>Organization: University of Georgia
>Keywords: 200008241414.e7OEEjN11917 ldm-mcidas ROUTE.SYS BATCH McIDAS
Tom,
>After spending all of that time getting cacimbo (my SPARC 20) running
>correctly, we decided we'd better eventually move over to this dual
>Pentium LINUX system I mentioned (sirocco.ggy.uga.edu). I'm feeding from
>cacimbo to sirroco while I get it ready.
I saw your messages to Anne on this move.
>I've actually made quite a bit of progress. After a few glictes, the LDM
>seems to be working fine. GEMPAK and McIDAS installed/built correctly. I
>got the ADDE server working (I think, haven't checked it yet), and the XCD
>decoders working. Sirocco seems to be handling the load much
>better. It also has a 100Mbit card and is on the same hub as my
>instructional lab, which will be important when I start using it in class.
Sounds good.
>I was setting up postprocessing for the GOES composites when I ran into
>problems. I made sure the xcd_run was set up and released the appropriate
>ROUTE entries.
For reference, xcd_run controls the XCD data decoding. For ROUTE PostProces
BATCH file processing, you need to do the same configuration to the
Bourne shell script file, batch.k. A copy of 'batch.k' is distributed
with ldm-mcidas; it should be copied to some intransient directory in
the 'ldm' account (like ~ldm/decoders). Edit it just like you did for
xcd_run, and make sure that the directory it is in is in the PATH for
'ldm' and it is set to be executable.
>After a while, I would get very strange ROUTE entries:
>
> 2144--213 62144 0621 4
Hmm... The routing entries are written by the decoder, pnga2area in
this case.
>The entries appear 10-20 times in the ROUTE LIST.
Sounds very bad.
>I started with a fresh ROUTE.SYS file, released the entires for
>postprocessing, the did an "ldmadmin watch -f MCIDAS" and tailed the
>BATCHPP.LOG file. The strange ROUTE entries occured with...
>
>Aug 24 13:46:21 pqutil: 78707 20000824134610.164 MCIDAS 000 pnga2area
>Q0 CB 1110 GOES-10_SND UNKBAND 14km 20000824 1200
>Aug 24 13:48:19 pqutil: 76537 20000824134810.615 MCIDAS 000 pnga2area
>Q0 CD 1130 GOES-10_SND UNKBAND 14km 20000824 1200
>
>in the feed and...
>
>BATCH CB 0 100237 120000 1 "
>BATCH CD 0 100237 120000 1 "
>
>Are these the CIMSS products?
Yes, these are CIMSS products. The indicator in the 'ldmadmin watch'
output is the 'Q0' time quartile indicator.
>I haven't tried to configure for those yet.
OK.
>The last two things I need to do are: (1) configure for the CIMSS
>products, and (2) configure for the NOAAPort GINI products in
>/data/goeseast.
OK, this should not be too difficult.
>I have saved your e-mails from when you did this on
>cacimbo and was going to try to reproduce on sirocco. Also, it doesn't
>appear that the composites are actually being created.
So, something is wrong.
>If you want a peek, the mcidas login is ... temporarily. (I know
>it's short on space for now. I will eventually move the disk on cacimbo
>over to this system.)
I tried getting on the machine and running McIDAS things, but I was unable
to:
cd workdata
dmap.k ROUTE.SYS
dmap.k: Cannot create negative UC
This says that you are out of memory!? This is strange given that
you appear to have a bunch of swap available:
$top
12:59pm up 3 days, 3:17, 4 users, load average: 0.61, 0.24, 0.55
82 processes: 75 sleeping, 3 running, 4 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 11.3% user, 6.0% system, 1.5% nice, 1.8% idle
Mem: 257684K av, 254516K used, 3168K free, 55228K shrd, 58460K buff
Swap: 530104K av, 2368K used, 527736K free 119584K cached
The thing I did notice, however, was that you were totally out of disk
space:
$ df -k
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda6 7155068 6792364 0 100% /
/dev/hda2 23333 5001 17128 23% /boot
/dev/fd0 1412 647 693 48% /mnt/floppy
This could be the reason for the dmap.k failure. As soon as you can get some
space for maneuvering, I will login again and continue to take a look.
>Thanks.
>
>P.S. Still bugging UCNS about port 503. Having a hard time just getting a
>reponse from anyone. I can't negotiate with anyone because I can't find
>the person responsible for blocking the port!
Keep after it. Eventually, someone will be found that understands the
network setup and also be able to make the needed change.
Tom