[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[IDV #JWC-587009]: Change to 80km GFS precip field?

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [IDV #JWC-587009]: Change to 80km GFS precip field?
  • Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:06:03 -0600
> Hey Yuan-
> 
> I hadn't run the IDV for a while, and today I brought up my favorite GFS
> bundle:
> 
> https://psl.noaa.gov/repository/entry/get/gfs80km.xidv?entryid=8ed2cb87-762c-4bf2-af7e-1ef959db2b11
> 
> The precipitation used to be the precip at each interval, but now it
> seems to be an accumulation from the analysis time.  Was there a change
> in the way TDS indexes this field or was there a change in the GFS data?
> 
> I'm running 5.7, not the nightly.
> 
> Don
> --
> Don Murray
> NOAA/PSL and CU-CIRES
> 303-497-3596
> https://www.psl.noaa.gov/people/don.murray/
> 
> 
I remember Sean mentioned this change a while ago, it is the change of the GFS 
data. I have the same problem with 
the coverage type, it is more difficult to deal with the best time-series data.

Maybe the solution is to add a derived function to deal with it.

Yuan



Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: JWC-587009
Department: Support IDV
Priority: Normal
Status: Open
===================
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata 
inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web.  If 
you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must 
let us know in each email you send to us.