This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
> Yuan, > So when you run my bundle, do you get the same result? > -Rich > When I ran the bundle, I got even worst result. My feeling is that those missing vectors were likely associated with very small values. If you draw wind barb, you will get every points. Yuan > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Unidata IDV Support > <address@hidden> wrote: > >> We are running 5.1u2. Did you look at the bundle? All your > >> questions are answered by the bundle, no? > > > > > > Rich, > > I have no problem getting the result similar to the python output. > > See the attached. However, your bundle does look very strange, almost like > > some kind of > > filter working there. I will check and let you know. > > > > > > Yuan > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Unidata IDV Support > >> <address@hidden> wrote: > >> > Rich, > >> > > >> > Here are a few comments: > >> > > >> > - Update your IDV to the latest version (5.1u2, this will yield no > >> > improvement > >> > probably, but it is usually best to work with the latest version of the > >> > IDV). > >> > > >> > - For clarification, the flow vectors are supposed to be derived from > >> > what? The > >> > data contain two u and v fields (momentum versus stokes). Which one are > >> > you > >> > interested in? (I wonder if there is confusion/mismatches going on here.) > >> > > >> > - Are you sure you are looking at the same geographic extents? The IDV is > >> > displayed roughly over NY harbor. I cannot tell where the Python plot is > >> > located. > >> > > >> > - I wonder if there are numerical errors going on. One of the Derived > >> > Fields in > >> > the IDV is "Speed (from U & V)". When you do a "Value Plot" of these > >> > data, do > >> > you get numbers you expect? > >> > > >> > - Experiment with the Flow Vector Control in the IDV Dashboard, Displays > >> > Tab. > >> > > >> > Keep us up-to-date on your progress. > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > > >> > Unidata IDV Support > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> IDV Gurus, > >> >> > >> >> We are struggling to get bottom velocity vectors displayed properly in > >> >> IDV (5.0u2) for a Hurricane Sandy ocean simulation. > >> >> > >> >> The bottom velocity for 2012-10-30 00:00:00 should look like the 1st > >> >> attached image (plotted in python using this notebook): > >> >> http://nbviewer.ipython.org/gist/rsignell-usgs/a85e68a71933910a171a > >> >> > >> >> but instead it looks like the 2nd attached image. > >> >> > >> >> In the IDV image you can see that the flow at the coast is the wrong > >> >> direction, and there are those strange black areas with no vectors. > >> >> > >> >> What is going on here? > >> >> > >> >> I'm attaching the bundle so you can recreate this yourself. > >> >> -- > >> >> Dr. Richard P. Signell (508) 457-2229 > >> >> USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd. > >> >> Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598 > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Ticket Details > >> > =================== > >> > Ticket ID: WHS-790529 > >> > Department: Support IDV > >> > Priority: Normal > >> > Status: Closed > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Dr. Richard P. Signell (508) 457-2229 > >> USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd. > >> Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598 > >> > >> > > > > > > Ticket Details > > =================== > > Ticket ID: WHS-790529 > > Department: Support IDV > > Priority: Normal > > Status: Open > > > > -- > Dr. Richard P. Signell (508) 457-2229 > USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd. > Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598 > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: WHS-790529 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open