[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IDV #YZK-803896]: Ticket# BRK-528772
- Subject: [IDV #YZK-803896]: Ticket# BRK-528772
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:24:43 -0600
> Yuan,
>
> You image looks great and I wish I could replicate it! Where did you change
> the standard longitude?
>
> David
There is global attribute in this file:
:STAND_LON = -90.0f; // float
Change this to -80 will make it works.
Yuan
>
> On Sep 23, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Unidata IDV Support <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >>> Yuan,
> >>>
> >>> For whatever reason, what you have detailed below does not work for me.
> >>> I would like both the 2D and 3D fields to be correctly displayed in the
> >>> stereographic projection in IDV. I also don’t see two map projections
> >>> defined in the netCDF file (in the field selector tab I right-clicked on
> >>> the file and read the metadata and can only find Polar Stereographic).
> >>> Can you clarify where you see this? When I load in any variable (2-D or
> >>> 3-D) and and click on use grid projection I still see that the coastline
> >>> does not match up with the background map as in the image I sent
> >>> previously. Before loading in the data I did unselect the
> >>> auto-projection feature. I do see that the projection is set to
> >>> stereographic but the two still don’t align. Would you be able to send
> >>> me an image of he model terrain on top of the background map to see how
> >>> it differs from my own? Also, I am using IDV 4.1 if that makes any
> >>> difference.
> >>>
> >>> David
> >>>
> >>
> >> David,
> >> I see the problem.
> >> For historical reason, the nc output from the WRF has never been CF
> >> compliance. The netCDF group developers have to do something special to
> >> make it look like good nc file. In your case,
> >> the stereographic projection is being applied to the 3D variable but not
> >> 2D and this is likely why you see the coast lines not match with your data.
> >>
> >> I will check if there is anything can be done here to make it works.
> >>
> >>
> >> Yuan
> >
> > David,
> > The problem is your dataset. The standard longitude in this data
> > file is still -90, not -125 as you claimed in your first email. If I
> > changed this value to -80, I can get
> > the corrected location, see the attached.
> >
> >
> > Yuan
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 23, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Unidata IDV Support <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> IDV Support,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have uploaded the WRF file. In addition, I have attached a .gif
> >>>>> image here showing how the coast lines don’t match.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for your help,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> David Siuta
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi David,
> >>>> There is nothing wrong with the IDV or your dataset. Inside this nc
> >>>> dataset, there are two set projections, polar stereographic and lat/lon.
> >>>> When you load a 2D variable, it is using lat/lon projection.
> >>>> If you want to see the same projection for 3D variable, you can turn off
> >>>> the auto set projection under Projections > Auto-set Projection before
> >>>> creating the display. If you want to switch between these two
> >>>> projections, right click on the legend of one of display and select:
> >>>> View > Use Grid Projection. The IDV will do the work of converting the
> >>>> projection automatically for you.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yuan
> >>>>>
> >>>>> address@hidden
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sep 23, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Unidata IDV Support <address@hidden>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> David,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sorry for the delayed response.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please upload your WRF sample data here:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://motherlode.ucar.edu/repository/alias/idvupload
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> and let us know when it has been uploaded.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Unidata IDV Support
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> IDV support,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have done some research in to my problem (Ticket BRK-528772) and
> >>>>>>> found
> >>>>>>> that the standard longitude is not the problem. It is actually the
> >>>>>>> map
> >>>>>>> projection used by WRF that doesn’t work well with IDV. Any WRF runs
> >>>>>>> I have done using the polar stereographic map projection do not match
> >>>>>>> the background map supplied in IDV when I try to view the output in
> >>>>>>> IDV
> >>>>>>> (as well as the latitude and longitude of the WRF grid does not match
> >>>>>>> the background map). To test this out I changed the WRF projection to
> >>>>>>> Lambert Conformal Conic and reran WRF and no matter what the standard
> >>>>>>> longitude was, the WRF grid was able to perfectly match the IDV
> >>>>>>> background map. Even though switching WRF to the Lambert projection
> >>>>>>> has
> >>>>>>> solved this problem temporarily, I have a lot of output in the Polar
> >>>>>>> Stereographic projection and would like to be able to use IDV to view
> >>>>>>> some of the output. Do you have any ideas on how to fix this?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> David Siuta
> >>>>>>> address@hidden
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Weather Forecast Research Team
> >>>>>>> University of British Columbia
> >>>>>>> Vancouver, BC Canada
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ticket Details
> >>>>>> ===================
> >>>>>> Ticket ID: YZK-803896
> >>>>>> Department: Support IDV
> >>>>>> Priority: Normal
> >>>>>> Status: Closed
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ticket Details
> >>>> ===================
> >>>> Ticket ID: YZK-803896
> >>>> Department: Support IDV
> >>>> Priority: Normal
> >>>> Status: Closed
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: YZK-803896
> > Department: Support IDV
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Closed<terrain.gif>
>
>
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: YZK-803896
Department: Support IDV
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed