This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
> > On Dec 4, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Unidata IDV Support > <address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden>> wrote: > > One question is, what does the IDV use to determine the vertical coordinate > of each grid point in the field that it is contouring? If it is the value of > sigma (between 0 and 1, with 1 at the bottom and 0 at the top of the domain), > then where does sigma = 1 begin on the plot's vertical scale? (Should it be > same as z = 0 for the topographic profile?) And why wouldn't the bottom edge > of the plot be a straight, horizontal line (corresponding to the same value > of sigma)? (In my plot, the bottom of the vertical cross section is mostly a > straight, horizontal line, but it indents upward in distinct, rectangular > steps to stay above the highest terrain.) > > Dave, I checked with John about the coordinate transfer in the WRF output. The CDM library uses the formula: pressure formula", "pressure(x,y,z) = P(x,y,z) + PB(x,y,z), and height(x,y,z) = (PH(x,y,z) + PHB(x,y,z)) / 9.81") And I checked the data value of PH and PHB, not seeing many area with the value of 0. Another information from MMM WRF support is that we can not compare the terrain height with the model first level height. And they think the output is correct. So I guess there is not much can be explored from the IDV side. You can verify the first level value of the PH and PHB in the IDV. Yuan Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: WYC-198714 Department: Support IDV Priority: Emergency Status: Closed