This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Jim, Yuan: The matching is good, but the "best" time series on the server isn't actually grabbing the "best" files available. For example, if we compare the "best" for the GFS 1.0 degree for 2013-09-08 18Z, 21Z with the 2013-09-08 run using 18Z (analysis), 21Z (3 hour forecast) the grids turn out to be different (I'm comparing MSLP_Eta_Model_Reduction), even though they *should* be the same. This is not always the case with the best time series, but it is occurring on a few other datasets. We're looking into it, and hopefully we'll have an answer soon. Sean > > Hi: > > > > I'm continuing to see problems with what I'll call the mismatching > > of datasets in several of my bundles. For example, the bundle available > > at > > http://weather.utah.edu/synoptic/idv/Site_Config/bundles/WX-Disco/Analyses/Supernational.xidv > > uses time matching and the "best time series" option. Instead of > > getting a string of model analyses with perhaps a 6-h forecast, it > > appears to be pulling together a hodge-podge of model forecasts, some of > > which must be fairly long forecasts as they simply don't match the > > satellite loop very well. > > > > Jim > > > Jim, > I ran the bundle and didn't see the problem you had. The matching looks good, > see the attached screen cast. > > > Yuan > > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: HDK-232421 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open