[IDV #XZK-350140]: possibly extra work being done which may not be required

> > > On 10/19/2012 02:13 PM, Unidata IDV Support wrote:
> > > > Ghansham Sangar,
> > > >
> > > > Your Ticket has been received, and a Unidata staff member will review 
> > > > it and reply accordingly. Listed below are details of this new Ticket. 
> > > > Please make sure the Ticket ID remains in the Subject: line on all 
> > > > correspondence related to this Ticket.
> > > >
> > > >      Ticket ID: XZK-350140
> > > >      Subject: possibly extra work being done which may not be required
> > > >      Department: Support IDV
> > > >      Priority: Normal
> > > >      Status: Open
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please let us know how we can assist you further.
> > > >
> > > > Unidata User Support
> > > >
> > > Any updates on this?
> > >
> > >
> > Ghansham,
> > Sorry for taking so long to come back to this ticket.
> > I am going to start the discussion with SSEC group about these discoveries. 
> > The LatLon Label issue need to be addressed by SSEC developers, I will 
> > check the color scale and the display property issues. We also got the 
> > report from other user regarding the legend label changing in display 
> > property causing the re loading or re rendering of the  whole display.
> >
> >
> > Yuan
> >
> >
> Ghansham,
> I played around the rerendering processes during the zoom in and out, I 
> didn't see any redundent steps. Each time you zoom in and out, the IDV need 
> to rerender the label, and it is not surprise that the cost of rerender of 
> the label is high. What is your discovery on this?
> 
> 
> Yuan

Again, both lat/lon labels and colorscale objects are existed even if you don't 
turn on the visibility. You can consider this a waste of cpu in your case, but 
it is in the design, not a bug. We will consider this design in the future when 
redo the colorscale.

Yuan

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: XZK-350140
Department: Support IDV
Priority: Critical
Status: Open