[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[IDV #ILT-566886]: vertical profiles with depth, not altitude



> Yuan,
> 
> Please take a look at the attached figure (#1), which doesn't seem like
> much, but I'm so proud of it and so thankful to you and Rich Signell for
> helping me with all the tricks involved.  It is based on the "corrected"
> NetCDF profile that Charles Sun provided (consisting of only a few points).
> But eventually, we could make these color-coded profiles for groups of GTSPP
> stations, grabbed online through THREDDS catalogs.

Murray,
    The physical file (13237135.nc) is corrected from the beginning. The 
problem is the THREDDS server need to be updated (I will check with TDS 
developer to make sure). There are two URLs here and confused me:

http://data.nodc.noaa.gov/thredds/dodsC/gtspp/indian/2012/01/13237135.nc

and 

http://data.nodc.noaa.gov/thredds/dodsC/gtspp/netcdf4.0/indian/2012/01/gtspp_13237135_te_111.nc


Which one are you planning to use?


Yuan 
> 
> This will be, for us in the water world, a huge step, in terms of
> efficiency, potential for synthesis, and compatibility with some training
> we're already doing.  The hope (watch out Charles, here comes my soap box)
> is that we'll have user-defined delivery of spatially and temporally
> selected individual NetCDF profiles.  When the files have the "positive"
> syntax correction, then the use of 0 to -160 depths gives really FINE
> figures.  [I'm using Ocean Data View for mega-collections based on Charles'
> TGZ compressions...that's a different matter.]
> 
> The second figure is one of the existing NC profiles on the GTSPP server, to
> show you how much better they begin to look with more data points.  That
> figure comes directly from IDV/THREDDS, one click, without any ncml fix.  So
> it's still upside down.  I'll need some IDV help on applying a layout that
> makes the dots larger (perhaps scaled to temp); they ARE currently colored
> by temp, but it's not easy to see on these small figs.
> 
> I really hope this dialogue, made necessary by my blundering around, might
> continue and lead to good IDV/UNIDATA-GTSPP/NODC discussions.  It seems to
> me that a lot could be accomplished.
> 
> Murray
> 
> 
 
 

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: ILT-566886
Department: Support IDV
Priority: Normal
Status: Open