This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi, Kevin Yuan and I reproduced the horizontal line problem you see. We are pursuing a bug fix, but in the meantime, we can offer a couple of workarounds: 1/ Select fast rendering (Dashboard / Display / Edit / Properties / Settings) 2/ Spatially subset the data (Dashboard / Data sources / Properties / Spatial Subset) Thanks, -Julien PS, I am new to Unidata, and the IDV team. > Hi Don, > > The units are correct now. > > Perhaps an unrelated bug, but I notice if I change projections (e.g., to > US), a number of horizontal lines appear on the plot. I've attached an > exmaple . . . > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > On 07/26/2010 06:06 PM, Unidata netCDF Java Support wrote: > > Kevin- > > > > The IDV nightly build has this fix. Please test it if you have a chance. > > > > Don Murray > > > > > >> Thanks, John! > >> > >> On 07/21/2010 06:49 PM, Unidata netCDF Java Support wrote: > >> > >>> This bug is fixed in current 4.2 code. We are trying to get a stable > >>> version of it released. Will let you know when its ready. thanks for your > >>> patience. > >>> > >>> John > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> When I load in NetCDF files from the 20th century reanalysis dataset > >>>> from the NCDC NOMADS TDS, I can read and plot data, but the data values > >>>> are not correct. For example, 850 mb temperature grids found in the > >>>> air.YYYY.nc files will plot as if their temperatures fall between 430 > >>>> and 430.7 K, with a default contour interval of .04 K. Similar > >>>> unrealistic data ranges/contour levels will appear when other fields in > >>>> the 20CR data set are loaded. > >>>> > >>>> The netCDF files look fine, and they plot OK with other tools (I tried > >>>> ncview). I suspect there is some issue with how IDV is interpreting the > >>>> netcdf file. Note that the "add_offset" value (427.66) in the air.nc > >>>> files is suspiciously close to the 430K level that IDV is coming up with > >>>> . . . > >>>> > >>>> Any ideas? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> --Kevin > >>>> > >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ > >>>> Kevin Tyle, Systems Administrator ********************** > >>>> Dept. of Atmospheric& Environmental Sciences address@hidden > >>>> University at Albany, ES-235 518-442-4578 (voice) > >>>> 1400 Washington Avenue 518-442-5825 (fax) > >>>> Albany, NY 12222 ********************** > >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Ticket Details > >>> =================== > >>> Ticket ID: WXG-265938 > >>> Department: Support netCDF Java > >>> Priority: High > >>> Status: Closed > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Ticket Details > > =================== > > Ticket ID: WXG-265938 > > Department: Support netCDF Java > > Priority: High > > Status: Open > > > > > > > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: WXG-265938 Department: Support IDV Priority: Critical Status: Open