This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Jim- > I'm clueless still. I looked at some of my GFS scripts and didn't > notice anything weird with the sign, but I wrote them along time ago, so > it's a bit like reading french. Perhaps the vertical indicies are > switched? I'm grasping at straws. Me too. ;-) It looks like dtheta/dp is coming up with inverse signs. I'm trying to track that down now. > At least now I can do a 3-D demo for the students. Thanks! At least that's a positive! Thanks for your help in tracking this down. Don > Unidata IDV Support wrote: > > Hi Jim- > > > > > >> I've plotted up the nam211 and the GFS 80 km (I can't recall the > >> grid number). The nam *looks* correct. The GFS *looks* correct with > >> the sign error that you mention below. > >> > > > > Oh, good, it's not just me. ;-) > > > > > >> I'm at a loss for the cause of the sign error in the GFS. In the > >> southern hemisphere, the PV *would* be negative. Why it is in the NH I > >> don't know. The absolute vorticity calculated from U_wind and v_wind > >> looks correct and this is what determines the sign of the PV normally. > >> About all I can think of is that there is some weird convention in the > >> NCEP grids (like gravity being negative). > >> > > > > Yeah, I'll try to look more closely at the individual grids. > > > > > >> Are you doing a conversion to isentropic coordinates for this or > >> just using the pressure coordinate absolute vorticity? > >> > > > > No, I'm using the calculated THTA from T and P and the calculated AVOR from > > U and V. The existing absolute vorticity grid is only 3 levels. > > > > Thanks for checking that at least it looks reasonable (except for the > > sign). I'll dig deeper. It's probably something simple, but for the life > > of me I can't figure out what. Maybe it is something to do with the > > latitude if it should be negative in the SH. > > > > Have a great weekend! > > > > Don > > > > Unidata IDV Support wrote: > > > >>> Hi Jim- > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> That's interesting. I haven't had a chance to download the latest > >>>> build yet. Is last nights OK except for the sign error? Send me the > >>>> URL again. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Last night's is okay except for the sign error. You can grab it at: > >>> > >>> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/downloads/idv/nightly/ > >>> > >>> Don > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Unidata IDV Support wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Jim- > >>>>> > >>>>> I have a met question for you. If I negate the grid for the GFS, I get > >>>>> what I would consider as correct results. However, for the NAM, the > >>>>> values are then wrong. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you download the nightly build and run the Displays->Favorite > >>>>> Bundles->NAM211->Isentropic Potential Vorticity bundle, you should get > >>>>> a reasonable depiction. Can you confirm this? > >>>>> > >>>>> However, if you do a GFS isosurface, the values are negated. If you > >>>>> set the isosurface value to -2, it should look like the NAM 2 IPVunit > >>>>> surface. The GEMPAK formula is: > >>>>> > >>>>> -GRAVTY*AVOR(V)*dTheta/dP > >>>>> > >>>>> There was a note in the code that using the - gives the wrong values, > >>>>> but I'm stumped as to way it works with one grid and not the other. > >>>>> Both are GRIB1, both have a vertical dimension of P in hectopascals. > >>>>> Any thoughts on this? > >>>>> > >>>>> I'll keep looking into it, but thought I'd turn to a professional for > >>>>> some advice. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the meantime, you can just use the -2 isosurface for the GFS. ;-) > >>>>> > >>>>> Don > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> I was trying to plot an isosurface. That "works", but the result is > >>>>>>> best described as "gobbledygook." The ability to do a 2 PVU > >>>>>>> isosurface > >>>>>>> is really powerful for teaching PV thinking. That's when I noticed > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>> error. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> I found one error which was that absolute vorticity was being > >>>>>> calculated incorrectly. That will be fixed in the nightly build. > >>>>>> However, I'm now trying to get IPV correct. I compared the results > >>>>>> from GEMPAK and they match. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> However, IPV is even worse now. :-( I'll have to do some plan view > >>>>>> plots in GEMPAK to compare with since I don't have any other program > >>>>>> to show what the isosurface should look like. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks for your patience. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Don > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Unidata IDV Support wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Jim- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I've moved this to the support system. Best to send questions to > >>>>>>>> support-idv instead of me directly so we can better track these > >>>>>>>> issues. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks for catching this. Did this ever work? I've always done this > >>>>>>>> as a volume since IPV needs several levels. If you select 2 (or > >>>>>>>> more) levels in the levels panel, you'll be able to do the slice for > >>>>>>>> a plan view. However, the list of levels in the control will not > >>>>>>>> reflect the levels you selected, but the entire list of levels. > >>>>>>>> We're working on a fix to this. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Don > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ERROR: Creating display: Contour Plan View > >>>>>>>>> org.python.core.PyException > >>>>>>>>> Traceback (innermost last): > >>>>>>>>> File "<string>", line 1, in ? > >>>>>>>>> at visad.FlatField.derivative(FlatField.java:4044) > >>>>>>>>> at visad.FlatField.derivative(FlatField.java:4485) > >>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> ucar.unidata.data.grid.DerivedGridFactory.partial(DerivedGridFactory.java:2366) > >>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> ucar.unidata.data.grid.DerivedGridFactory.createIPV(DerivedGridFactory.java:1954) > >>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> ucar.unidata.data.grid.DerivedGridFactory.createIPV(DerivedGridFactory.java:1880) > >>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > >>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > >>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > >>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> visad.VisADException: visad.VisADException: derivative: d_partial_s > >>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>> in domain or reference > >>>>>>>>> ERROR: Creating display: Contour Plan View > >>>>>>>>> org.python.core.PyException > >>>>>>>>> Traceback (innermost last): > >>>>>>>>> File "<string>", line 1, in ? > >>>>>>>>> at visad.FlatField.derivative(FlatField.java:4044) > >>>>>>>>> at visad.FlatField.derivative(FlatField.java:4485) > >>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> ucar.unidata.data.grid.DerivedGridFactory.partial(DerivedGridFactory.java:2366) > >>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> ucar.unidata.data.grid.DerivedGridFactory.createIPV(DerivedGridFactory.java:1954) > >>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> ucar.unidata.data.grid.DerivedGridFactory.createIPV(DerivedGridFactory.java:1880) > >>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > >>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > >>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > >>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> visad.VisADException: visad.VisADException: derivative: d_partial_s > >>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>> in domain or reference > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ticket Details > >>>>>>>> =================== > >>>>>>>> Ticket ID: ZDT-182699 > >>>>>>>> Department: Support IDV > >>>>>>>> Priority: Normal > >>>>>>>> Status: Open > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> Ticket Details > >>>>> =================== > >>>>> Ticket ID: ZDT-182699 > >>>>> Department: Support IDV > >>>>> Priority: Normal > >>>>> Status: Open > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> Ticket Details > >>> =================== > >>> Ticket ID: ZDT-182699 > >>> Department: Support IDV > >>> Priority: Normal > >>> Status: Open > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > Ticket Details > > =================== > > Ticket ID: ZDT-182699 > > Department: Support IDV > > Priority: Normal > > Status: Open > > > > > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: ZDT-182699 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open