This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Eric- The latest nightly build will only show legends for those displays that are set visible. However, there will be a gap if there is no display for a particular timestep. Don > I tried to send this once, but was logged out of the system. > I apologize if you get two responses. Hopefully, they'll > be the same. ;-) > > > Institution: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign > > Package Version: 2.3 build date:2007-08-15 19:04 UTC > > Operating System: Linux > > Hardware Information: Java: home: /opt/idv-2.3/jre version: 1.5.0_11 > > j3d:1.3.1 > > Inquiry: I have created a bundle that loads 17 fields from traditional NCEP > > model output. In > > order to make the current displays readable for my audience, I checked > > "Show Display List" > > under the "View" tab of "Edit" - "Preferences." At first, ALL displays are > > listed, regardless > > of which ones are actually being displayed. After checking and unchecking > > the fields > > not being displayed at the time, the list is reduced to just the current > > displays. > > Oops, thought I had fixed that one a while back. Thanks for finding > this. The fix will be in tomorrow night's build. This should fix > the other problem you reported as well. > > > However, it seems that each field has a designated line number in the list > > that > > is displayed. For example, IPV and Omega appear near the top of the > > original list > > of all 17 fields that are listed upon checking "Show Display List." If I > > only > > want to show these two fields, they remain listed about 15 lines above the > > bottom > > of the display window, right over CONUS. I assume it would > > be an easy fix to have the current displays default to the bottom of the > > display > > window to prevent blocking the visualization. When a display is unchecked > > (i.e., not > > displayed), its line in the list should be entirely removed, and, given > > displays listed > > above, these should each be moved down one line. When a display is > > checked, its > > list location should be defaulted to the line immediately above the top > > display in the list, > > or at the bottom of the window if no other displays are current. I have a > > bundle which demonstrates this problem; please respond if you would like it > > to > > investigate these two issues. THANKS! > > While there is an "easy fix" for this, the overhead might be worse > than the cure. There is no performance hit to toggle the visibility, > but reordering the displays will cause a re-rendering for all the > display list items. > > However, I've implemented the change and will play around with it > and get some feedback from others on this. There might be some more > we can do so only those things that need to be reordered will be. > > Another option would be to use the Edit-Preferences to turn off the > Show In Display List option for most of the displays, but pick one > for each of the Display Groups you turn off and on. Use a custom > Display List label that explains what is in that group. That way > instead of having lots of labels, you condense the number on the > screen. It's a little more work, but might help in either case. > > Don > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: XDR-492323 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open