This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi HP- > Institution: EUMETSAT > Package Version: 2.2b1 > Operating System: Windows XP > Hardware Information: Java: home: C:\\Program Files\\IDV_2.2b1\\jre version: > 1.5.0_06 j3d:1.3.2 fcs (build12) > Inquiry: Hi > > I am not sure where in IDV the following problem should be solved. > > ECMWF's operational model archives numerical fields at pressure and model > levels. > With model levels one gets much higher vertical resolution as compared to the > standard pressure levels only. This e.g. is attractive when looking for > boundary layer > inversions creating soundings (see another Support Request). However, IDV > gets lost when decoding a GRIB file containing model levels > (see attached sample). For convenience I also attach a chapter from the ECMWF > documentation that explains the dirctization issue. The full document may be > found at > > http://www.ecmwf.int/research/ifsdocs/CY28r1/index.html > > Can this be straightened out? The IDV currently can't handle quasi-regular (thinned) grids in GRIB 1 format but does handle them in GRIB2 format. That accounts for the "lost" part. For the hybrid levels, right now we scale them to the vertical axis in the display. So, if you can get them on regular grids or in GRIB2 format, you can then set your vertical axis to the range of the vertical levels (e.g. 0-50). Don Murray Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: SII-492455 Department: Support IDV Priority: Emergency Status: Open