[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[IDD #UDG-536221]: GEFS

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [IDD #UDG-536221]: GEFS
  • Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:14:23 -0600
Hi Justin,

I apologize for the slow reply.  Our inquiry tracking system was
offline until yesterday afternoon, and I am just catching up on
the inquiries that have built up...

re:
> Any word regarding this issue? I noticed Michael posted new pqact patterns
> recently, but I don't believe GEFS was altered.

No, but I will be meeting with Michael this afternoon about
some other things, and I will ping him on this issue.

> address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > re:
> > > Nothing wrong with CONDUIT specifically. There appears to be an issue
> > with
> > > the LDM pattern and how edex decodes it. Michael James explains below...
> >
> > OK.  If the problem really is one of an incorrect LDM pattern-action file
> > action, then switching feed types would not solve your problem.
> >
> > re:
> > > "So it seems that the file that is being decoder is not complete.  So I
> > > have to guess about this, but it may be that the file is incomplete when
> > > EDEX begins decoding, and it may be due to the pattern action being used.
> > > I can't say for sure until I test CONDUIT GEFS myself, but I know that
> > the
> > > GEFS on the NOAAport NGRID feed decodes without any error.  So my
> > > suggestions is to switch to NGRID GEFS for the time being."
> >
> > I will touch base with Michael about this when I return to Boulder on
> > Friday.
> >
> > re:
> > > So I wanted to see if there were alternative sources for this same type
> > of
> > > data. He had mentioned NGRID, so I wanted to inquire further.
> >
> > Even if the GEFS fields were in another feed, a problem caused by a
> > pattern-action file action would likely persist.  But, I can't be
> > 100% sure until I touch base with Michael.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: UDG-536221
> > Department: Support IDD
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Closed

Cheers,

Tom
--
****************************************************************************
Unidata User Support                                    UCAR Unidata Program
(303) 497-8642                                                 P.O. Box 3000
address@hidden                                   Boulder, CO 80307
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unidata HomePage                       http://www.unidata.ucar.edu
****************************************************************************


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: UDG-536221
Department: Support IDD
Priority: Normal
Status: Open