[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IDD #IVG-583515]: RE: EXT :20141114: NOAAPort relay Machine Set up at NG
- Subject: [IDD #IVG-583515]: RE: EXT :20141114: NOAAPort relay Machine Set up at NG
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:36:29 -0700
Hi Heather,
First, it was nice to "meet" you yesterday (phonewise anyway)...
re:
> I have attached your file. Next time you can also just allow x-forwarding
> and start firefox and email to yourself. I don't see why that wouldn't work!
OK.
re:
> We will chat at 9:00 your time also!
As a follow-up to our phone conversation yesterday, I can let you know that:
- a 'notifyme -vl- -h 208.24.128.84'
This works, but the output listing seems very slow for the volume/number
of products that should be flowing through 208.24.128.84.
- even though 'notifyme' demonstrated that we (gale, oliver, emo, agg1) are
ALLOWed in your machine's ~ldm/etc/ldmd.conf file, and we can somehow get
through the NG firewall, a feed REQUEST in ~ldm/etc/ldmd.conf results in
very little data being transferred
I setup a REQUEST for ANY from 208.24.128.84 on gale.unidata.ucar.edu and
have let the LDM run overnight. The volume of data for each NOAAPort-derived
feed is much less than what should be available. To see this, compare
various feed volumes on gale with volumes from one of our NOAAPort ingest
machines:
gale.unidata.ucar.edu
http://rtstats.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/siteindex?gale.unidata.ucar.edu
lenny.unidata.ucar.edu
http://rtstats.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/siteindex?lenny.unidata.ucar.edu
Since the NEXRAD3 feed is one of the most continuously populated data streams,
compare volumes of it between the two machines:
NEXRAD3 received on gale from your machine:
http://rtstats.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/iddstats_vol_nc?NEXRAD3+gale.unidata.ucar.edu
NEXRAD3 received in the NOAAPort SBN on lenny:
http://rtstats.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/iddstats_vol_nc?NEXRAD3+lenny.unidata.ucar.edu
The large difference in data volumes indicates that whatever is being done
securitywise at NG for the REQUEST from gale (e.g., going through a proxy;
deep packet
inspection and rewriting the IP address in the REQUEST; etc.) is seriously
limiting the data that is transferred.
Quite frankly, the way that things are setup right now is preventing and will
continue
to prevent 208.24.128.84 from being a viable input into the IDD. Is there
anything
that can be done in NG to improve this situation?
Cheers,
Tom
--
****************************************************************************
Unidata User Support UCAR Unidata Program
(303) 497-8642 P.O. Box 3000
address@hidden Boulder, CO 80307
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unidata HomePage http://www.unidata.ucar.edu
****************************************************************************
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: IVG-583515
Department: Support IDD
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed