[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20030123: ULM tornado and LSU sirocco feed problem
- Subject: 20030123: ULM tornado and LSU sirocco feed problem
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:39:34 -0700
>From: "adam taylor (994)" <address@hidden>
>Organization: ULM
>Keywords: 200301231822.h0NIMPx18441 IDD
Hi Adam,
re:
> Well been two days now and have had zero problems since switching
>over to seistan. All data and models are comming in on a timely enough
>manner. I guess sirocco was just being overworked. Also, as of now i
>have been feeding the nexrad feed from thelma. It's only a limited number
>of sites and along time ago i tried to feed it from sirocco but i never
>had an allow for it. Would seistan be able to handle the load if i
>started getting it from there. Just tring to figure out the servers that
>i should be feeding from.
It would useful if you swtiched your NEXRAD feed off of thelma.ucar.edu
and onto seistan. Please keep us informed as to your ingestion status
after the move.
Thanks in advance...
Tom Yoksas
>Thanks
>
>Adam
>
>
>On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Robert Leche wrote:
>
>> Hello Adam,
>>
>> As far as I know you are the only site experiencing problems. that
>> said.....
>>
>> I do not have an answer for your small file sizes. And even more
>> curious is the variation in file sizes. Again, as far as I know I have
>> not problems with I1 or I2, either. I believe it is time to get the
>> good people at Unidata involved in this problem. A stop gap solution I
>> want you try, feeding from our other LDM hosts: seistan.srcc.lsu.edu
>> and , our backup LDM feed site is : datoo.srcc.lsu.edu (NOAAport). It
>> would be useful to know how things work for you with the other feed
>> sources. This I know, Sirocco has seven down stream sites and is busy.
>> I am on the verge of make changes in how I source down stream sites
>> any way, so this is as I said useful to know. Unloading Sirocco will
>> help my loading problem and may take care your problems.
>>
>> I will recheck firewall and such on Seistan and Datoo, but switch over
>> and test the other systems one at a time and let me know your findings.
>> I'd say after connecting to these systems, collect data for a couple of
>> days on each system so we can see trends in data transfers.
>>
>> Here are my sao files listings for the day you listed:
>>
>> mistral [114] ls -l surface/wmo/030120*.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 438038 Jan 20 18:56
>> surface/wmo/03012000.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 411068 Jan 20 19:56
>> surface/wmo/03012001.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 419173 Jan 20 20:57
>> surface/wmo/03012002.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 432544 Jan 20 21:56
>> surface/wmo/03012003.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 417898 Jan 20 22:55
>> surface/wmo/03012004.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 428830 Jan 21 00:03
>> surface/wmo/03012005.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 447245 Jan 21 00:55
>> surface/wmo/03012006.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 417620 Jan 21 01:55
>> surface/wmo/03012007.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 409217 Jan 21 02:51
>> surface/wmo/03012008.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 430195 Jan 21 03:58
>> surface/wmo/03012009.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 431959 Jan 21 04:56
>> surface/wmo/03012010.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 435910 Jan 21 05:53
>> surface/wmo/03012011.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 449179 Jan 21 06:52
>> surface/wmo/03012012.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 439356 Jan 21 07:52
>> surface/wmo/03012013.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 445504 Jan 21 08:56
>> surface/wmo/03012014.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 465309 Jan 21 09:55
>> surface/wmo/03012015.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 451851 Jan 21 10:52
>> surface/wmo/03012016.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 453054 Jan 21 01:17
>> surface/wmo/03012017.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 466213 Jan 21 03:08
>> surface/wmo/03012018.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 449972 Jan 21 03:08
>> surface/wmo/03012019.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 431721 Jan 21 07:58
>> surface/wmo/03012020.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 430613 Jan 21 04:25
>> surface/wmo/03012021.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 422168 Jan 21 01:38
>> surface/wmo/03012022.sao
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ldm5 data 415234 Jan 21 08:41
>> surface/wmo/03012023.sao
>>
>> Assuming our pqact.conf decoding statements are the same, your files
>> should be inline with these. Also, send me a copy of your pqact.conf
>> and I will look into it.
>>
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> adam taylor (994) wrote:
>>
>> >Robert Leche:
>> >
>> > Have you been having feed problems for the past week or so? Ever
>> >since i have been re connected to sirocco my data files have looked like
>> >this:
>> >
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 77474 Jan 19 20:55 03011920_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 2516 Jan 19 21:55 03011921_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 1367 Jan 19 22:55 03011922_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 149981 Jan 19 23:55 03011923_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 223203 Jan 20 00:55 03012000_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 166696 Jan 20 01:55 03012001_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 163164 Jan 20 02:55 03012002_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 159031 Jan 20 03:55 03012003_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 628 Jan 20 04:55 03012004_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 1207 Jan 20 05:55 03012005_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 220945 Jan 20 06:55 03012006_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 166695 Jan 20 07:55 03012007_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 71863 Jan 20 08:55 03012008_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 295 Jan 20 09:55 03012009_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 704 Jan 20 10:55 03012010_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 169723 Jan 20 11:55 03012011_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 219896 Jan 20 12:55 03012012_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 173531 Jan 20 13:55 03012013_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 166846 Jan 20 14:55 03012014_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 88 Jan 20 15:55 03012015_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 195 Jan 20 16:55 03012016_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 8346 Jan 20 17:55 03012017_sao.wxp
>> >-rw-rw-r-- 1 ldm ldm 230181 Jan 20 18:55 03012018_sao.wxp
>> >
>> >As you can see i am having periods of almost all data lost. These files
>> >are the created by the wxp decoders for the surface data. The same thing
>> >is true for just about all types of data that i am currently feeding from
>> >sirocco. Even as i write this email the ldm is about 7 min behind. The
>> >other ldm servers that i feed from are all ariving on time. My network
>> >administrator says that there is no problem on the I2 line so i am writing
>> >you to see what is going on.
>> >
>> >Also my ldm logs are FULL of disconnects reclasses and skips from sirocco.
>> >
>> >Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> >Adam Taylor
>> >Department of Geosciences
>> >University of Louisiana at Monore
>> >
>>
>> --
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Robert Leche
>> System Administrator
>> Louisiana State University - Southern Regional Climate Center
>> 260 Howe-Russell Building
>> Baton Rouge, La. 70803
>> address@hidden
>> 225 578 5023
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------