[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: data feed source request
- Subject: Re: data feed source request
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 16:07:18 -0600 (MDT)
Hi Chuck,
I am sorry I have strung you along..
The issue is that we prefer to have only one feed per institution, this
eliminates chewing up bandwidth, that is why we have you feed from:
ldm.meteo.psu.edu
Which feeds directly from motherlode or thelma (our machines) and fails to
iita.rap.ucar.edu
In theory, this should be sufficient for you as well, since you feed from:
ldm.meteo.psu.edu
However, I see ldm.meteo.psu.edu has had some latency issues lately.
We may want to investigate deeper the initial feed to PSU.
Pennsylvania State
University
ldm.meteo.psu.edu
Pennsylvania State
University
EMS Environment
Institute
catena.essc.psu.edu
Pennsylvania State
University
Meteorology Research
Group
bricker.met.psu.edu
This is what PSU currently has running per our records, with
ldm.meteo.psu.edu being the "master" server. If one of the other dept's
has a faster/bigger machine we may want to re-evaluate the structure of
the feed.
Art,
Any input? I was seeing some strange NNEXRAD requests from
ldm.meteo.psu.edu it appeared as if you were only getting radar from
FTG|CYS|GJX but being a top tier NNEXRAD site:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/projects/idd/nexradFeed.html
For clarification:
navierldm.meteo is now ldm.meteo right?
It would be advisable to request NNEXRAD ".*" so downstream sites could
choose a smaller subset.
I know with the NMC2 (conduit) feed volume factors into the equation..
Thanks everyone,
-Jeff
____________________________ _____________________
Jeff Weber address@hidden
Unidata Support PH:303-497-8676
COMET Case Study Library FX:303-497-8690
University Corp for Atmospheric Research 3300 Mitchell Ln
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber Boulder,Co 80307-3000
________________________________________ ______________________
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Charles Pavloski wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I am seeing at least one stream (nexrad) at this point from
> ldm.meteo.psu.edu, so
> I guess we should go ahead and setup the failover server your leisure.
>
> Thanks
> Chuck P.
>
>