Re: Netcheck.log file from Blizzard

Hi Patrick and Mark, 

I concur, your connect to stokes is better.

I will ask Mark at OU if he can place an allow UNIDATA to go with the
allow NNEXRAD from stokes, and we will keep papagayo as your failover.

Hi Mark, 

You may already have this as I think we were considering stokes as a
failover, but if not could you be so kind as to allow Patrick at UNI an :

allow UNIDATA

for:

blizzard.storm.uni.edu

on 

stokes.metr.ou.edu

Thanks for your help,

-Jeff
____________________________                  _____________________
Jeff Weber                                    address@hidden
Unidata Support                               PH:303-497-8676 
NWS-COMET Case Study Library                  FX:303-497-8690
University Corp for Atmospheric Research      3300 Mitchell Ln
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber      Boulder,Co 80307-3000
________________________________________      ______________________

On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Patrick O'Reilly wrote:

> Hello Jeff,
> 
> I am attaching the netcheck.log file that ran for 24 hours or so.  I
> ran it hourly, should be enough to see something, I hope.  I looked at
> bits of it, and it seems that the connection to stokes is 2x as fast
> or so, with virtually no packet loss, where there is lots of packet
> loss between here and papagayo.  Anyway, you look for yourself, you
> have the expertise.  Thanks!
> 
> Patrick
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Patrick O'Reilly                               Support Scientist
> The STORM Project            address@hidden
> 208 Latham Hall                             ph: 319-273-3789
> University of Northern Iowa
> Cedar Falls, IA 50614             
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   
> 
>