This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Patrick and Mark, I concur, your connect to stokes is better. I will ask Mark at OU if he can place an allow UNIDATA to go with the allow NNEXRAD from stokes, and we will keep papagayo as your failover. Hi Mark, You may already have this as I think we were considering stokes as a failover, but if not could you be so kind as to allow Patrick at UNI an : allow UNIDATA for: blizzard.storm.uni.edu on stokes.metr.ou.edu Thanks for your help, -Jeff ____________________________ _____________________ Jeff Weber address@hidden Unidata Support PH:303-497-8676 NWS-COMET Case Study Library FX:303-497-8690 University Corp for Atmospheric Research 3300 Mitchell Ln http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber Boulder,Co 80307-3000 ________________________________________ ______________________ On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Patrick O'Reilly wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > I am attaching the netcheck.log file that ran for 24 hours or so. I > ran it hourly, should be enough to see something, I hope. I looked at > bits of it, and it seems that the connection to stokes is 2x as fast > or so, with virtually no packet loss, where there is lots of packet > loss between here and papagayo. Anyway, you look for yourself, you > have the expertise. Thanks! > > Patrick > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Patrick O'Reilly Support Scientist > The STORM Project address@hidden > 208 Latham Hall ph: 319-273-3789 > University of Northern Iowa > Cedar Falls, IA 50614 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >