[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 20010328: New LDM/IDD node

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: RE: 20010328: New LDM/IDD node
  • Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:54:31 -0600 (MDT)
Hi Shelly, 

Give Arlene a hello from me as well..

Additional feeds on the same campus should be fed from your ldm.

We like to have only one outside feed per campus in hopes of conserving
bandwidth.

So have your "other" ldm feed from your machine.

If you run into troubles with this please drop us a line.

You are probably in the midst of getting ready for hurricane season,
hopefully you will just get the needed rain ;)

Cheers,

-Jeff
____________________________                  _____________________
Jeff Weber                                    address@hidden
Unidata Support                               PH:303-497-8676 
NWS-COMET Case Study Library                  FX:303-497-8690
University Corp for Atmospheric Research      3300 Mitchell Ln
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber      Boulder,Co 80307-3000
________________________________________      ______________________

On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Happel, Shelly wrote:

> Hey Jeff,
> 
> I'm in the final throes of getting ldm up and running. Thanks for all of
> your help and patience. That last email I sent you explains how the folks in
> another department would like to receive some realtime data. 
> 
> Anne responded by saying they should install their own ldm. My question is -
> should they contact bill for an upstream feed - or if their feedset is a
> subset of ours, should they just feed from metlab@usf. 
> 
> Arelene suggested I contact you with this inquiry... 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Shelly
>