This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Neil, Checking in to see how your data feeds are holding up. I still have the allow on thelma for you as a failover and I suspect you are OK now with FSU as your primary feed. I will investigate replacing: aqua.nsstc.uah.edu as your failover, but as of now i would still use thelma for your failover until we can find another viable site to fail to.... Thanks, -Jeff ____________________________ _____________________ Jeff Weber address@hidden Unidata Support PH:303-497-8676 NWS-COMET Case Study Library FX:303-497-8690 University Corp for Atmospheric Research 3300 Mitchell Ln http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber Boulder,Co 80307-3000 ________________________________________ ______________________ On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Unidata Support wrote: > > ------- Forwarded Message > > >From: "Neil R. Smith" <address@hidden> > >Subject: failover alternate? > >Organization: Texas A&M > >Keywords: 200103280636.f2S6aPL16203 IDD failover > > ldm site: coriolis.met.tamu.edu > > Our present failover, aqua.nsstc.uah.edu, is currently > mostly unreachable - ping reports 80% packet loss. And > it's been running ~30% loss for the last day or so. > > If my primary, pluto, goes down, I'm concerned we wouldn't > be getting anything from aqua. Is there an alternate > failover available, or should I be concerned about this? > > Thanks, -Neil > > --- > Neil R. Smith, Comp. Sys. Mngr. address@hidden > Dept. Atmospheric Sci., Texas A&M Univ. 979/845-6272 > > > > ------- End of Forwarded Message > >