This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
=============================================================================== Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ =============================================================================== ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 14:41:22 -0600 (MDT) From: Jeff Weber <address@hidden> To: Pete Pokrandt <address@hidden>, Robb Kambic <address@hidden> David Fitzgerald <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden Subject: Re: difax scripts and ps files Pete, I had envisioned you feeding: sunshine.ssec.wisc.edu motherlode.ucar.edu sleet.wunderground.com datoo.srcc.lsu.edu These are our 4 top tier primary feed nodes... This way, you will not be overwhelmed. Upon your wishes, others "could" feed directly from you, if your bandwidth is holding up. I think ingesting it to the top tier machines would prove most efficient and least demanding on Wisc's resources. You would have more control doing a point to point transfer, but I believe you are not concerned with controlling the access of this data within the Unidata community-correct me if wrong here-. Opinions..? -Jeff ____________________________ _____________________ Jeff Weber address@hidden Unidata Support PH:303-497-8676 NWS-COMET Case Study Library FX:303-497-8690 University Corp for Atmospheric Research 3300 Mitchell Ln http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber Boulder,Co 80307-3000 ________________________________________ ______________________ On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Pete Pokrandt wrote: > > In a previous message to me, you wrote: > > >Hi Pete, > > > >I, for one, would like to thank you so much for taking on this task. It > sounds > >like it is very successful and I'm sure other sites in the Unidata > community > >will benefit by your work! > > > >If it's OK with you, I think Rich Clark (new Chair of the Users Committee) > >would like to make the initial announcement on this important > service/solution. > >He is going to call me this afternoon about creating some type of > announcement > >pointing to your efforts. Obviously, you mmay want to provide the details > for > >community members (perhaps in a separate announcement). As you you know, > this > >has been a Users Committee concern for a very long time, and Rich has been > >eager to assuage their concerns. > > > >Pete, if you disagree with this, please let me know ASAP. > > > >Again, thanks for your hard work in responding to an important issue on > behalf > >of the Unidata community. > > > >Linda > > > > Linda, > > I have no problems with Rich making the announcement. One question, do > we want to have all downstream sites feeding from me, or should it be a > tree structure similar to DDS/HDS/MCIDAS/etc? > > The files generally are about 1 Mb each, and I'm currently creating (and > will be broadcasting) over 100 maps per day. Not a huge bandwidth hog, > but if I've got 10's of people feeding from mapmaker all trying to get 1 > Mb files each at a time, that could slow things down. > > I'm fine with it either way, any thoughts? > > Pete > > -- > +>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<+ > ^ Pete Pokrandt V 1447 AOSS Bldg 1225 W Dayton St^ > ^ Systems Programmer V Madison, WI 53706 ^ > ^ V address@hidden ^ > ^ Dept of Atmos & Oceanic Sciences V (608) 262-3086 (Phone/voicemail) ^ > ^ University of Wisconsin-Madison V 262-0166 (Fax) ^ > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<+>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+ >