[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20000201: RPC: Unable to receive

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: 20000201: RPC: Unable to receive
  • Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 16:54:53 -0700 (MST)
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Unidata Support wrote:

> 
> ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> >To: <address@hidden>
> >From: "J. Christopher Clarke" <address@hidden>
> >Subject: Another problem...
> >Organization: .
> >Keywords: 200002012242.PAA29962
> 
> Folks,
> 
>       Could you give me an idea what to make of this error?
> We are still trying to get out DIFAX maps out and now, after
> addressing all of the printer issues, find this error:
> 
> $ ldmping lightning.alden.com
> Feb 01 22:25:57      State    Elapsed Port   Remote_Host           rpc_stat
> Feb 01 22:25:57  ADDRESSED   0.293528    0   lightning.alden.com  RPC: Unable 
> to
>  receive; errno = Connection reset by peer
> Feb 01 22:26:23 SVC_UNAVAIL   0.569741    0   lightning.alden.com  RPC: 
> Unable t
> o receive; errno = Connection reset by peer
> 
Chris,

It seems that the lightning machine is not running the ldm currently. I
would try the backup machine thunder.alden.com   If that doesn't help,
call alden support because the problem is on their end.  Also, I would
check that there's an allow for your site to match your request line for
DIFAX.


> We haven't gotten our LDM server to work correctly since I
> rebuilt it.  The former admin (Eric Pani) noted that the default
> data structure is completely different than what he was used to.


The data structure is dependent on the site, a site can set up any
structure to fit their needs. The LDM structure, which I don't think you
are talking about needs  to be as stated in the LDM pre Installation
instructions. 






> I haven't set up GEMPAK yet.  Could it be that data structure
> imposed by the GEMPAK pqact.conf is different from the LDM
> only pqact.conf structure?  I do plan on adding GEMPAK to our
> lineup soon.  I don't recall having so many problems setting up
> LDM/GEMPAK when I was out in Boulder... :)
>

I would check out the GEMPAK page on the pqact.conf entries. It's better
to follow the package guideline pqact entries.

Robb....


 
> Thanks for helping me set this puppy up.
> 
> Chris Clarke
> _____________________________________________________
> 
> J.  Christopher Clarke                address@hidden
> Assistant Professor
> University of Louisiana at Monroe
> Dept. of Geosciences
> _____________________________________________________
> 
> "This isn't flying.  This is falling... with style."
> _____________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
> 

===============================================================================
Robb Kambic                                Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III                      Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden             WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================