[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Data latencies: could much of this be avoided? (fwd)
- Subject: Re: Data latencies: could much of this be avoided? (fwd)
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 13:04:04 -0700 (MST)
===============================================================================
Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 11:50:09 -0600 (CST)
From: Gilbert Sebenste <address@hidden>
To: C. Vandersip <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Data latencies: could much of this be avoided?
Chris,
> Ok, I've changed my setup but I'm still getting IDS|DDPLUS|HDS latencies
> over 15 minutes right now. Here's what my request looks like:
>
> 51 request IDS|DDPLUS ".*" ns2.rutgers.edu
> 52 request HDS ".*" 165.230.4.74
> 53 request MCIDAS ".*" yang.sprl.umich.edu
> 54 request FSL2 ".*" 141.213.23.51
>
> Futhermore, I see only one pqact running:
>
> pluto.ldm> ps -aef | grep pqact
> ldm 23340 23337 0 19:54:02 ? 12:28 pqact
>
> What do I need to correct?
Nothing. If you re-started the LDM, you're fine. Ldm.pq does all the
work.
*******************************************************************************
Gilbert Sebenste ********
Internet: address@hidden (My opinions only!) ******
Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University ****
E-mail: address@hidden ***
web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu **
Work phone: 815-753-5492 *
*******************************************************************************