[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: McIDAS Data (fwd)

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: McIDAS Data (fwd)
  • Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 08:30:19 -0600 (MDT)

===============================================================================
Robb Kambic                                Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III                      Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden             WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 23:37:12 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Robert R. Mullenax" <address@hidden>
To: Michael W Dross <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: McIDAS Data

The problem I see is that those of us with only T1 conections
(we can't be the only ones) would be overloaded with the amount of
data.  1km imagery every 15 minutes would be great, but I don't
believe we can handle it.  It took three years to get upgraded
to a T1, I shudder to think about how long it would take to
convince the various entities to upgrade us to a T3,

Robert Mullenax

On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Michael W Dross wrote:

> 
> 
> With the tremendous amount of satellite imagery now available on NOAAPORT has
> anyone discussed the possiblity of replacing the MCIDAS satellite imagery with
> the GINI NOAAPORT data? I suspect that McIDAS can't handle GINI, I belive 
> GEMPAK
> can and  I know WXP can.  It might be a more cost effective solution
> and the NCF does have 24/7 coverage which in theory should provide a reliable
> data stream 24/7.
> 
> My $0.02
> 
> Mike Dross
> 
>