[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Higher resolution topographic gempak sat files
- Subject: Re: Higher resolution topographic gempak sat files
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:36:56 -0700
Alan,
The entry in imgtyp.tbl you have below has the wrong channel ID. It
should
be 32768 (not 32761). The number is channel 16 (which equates to
2**(16-1)).
The gini image is the same format as the remapped imagery that NESDIS
puts on NOAAPORT. I'm using the GOES-7 satellite ID (shouldn't get any
conflicts there)
and channel 16 which is outside the range of bands for GOES-7 as well.
Steve Chiswell
Unidata User Support
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 09:51 -0500, address@hidden wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I was able to provide to the requestor a 300 dpi copy of the chart in
> question with the old "low res" topo as they don't need the hi res for a
> while.
>
> So now I am trying to play with it a bit and am stuck.
>
> Here's what I did.
>
> 1. Downloaded the ustopo_dem5.gini and upc_dem5.tbl from the links you
> provided.
>
> 2. Then copied locally a copy of the imgtyp.tbl into the same directory
> I am running gpmap.
>
> 3. Next I added the following entry to that, per your recommendation:
> TOPO TOPO_DEM5 0 95 33 32761 upc_dem5.tbl
>
> 4. And finally this is what I have for entries in gpmap
> MAP = 1
> MSCALE = 0
> GAREA = dset
> PROJ = sat
> SATFIL = ustopo_dem5.gini
> RADFIL =
> IMCBAR =
> LATLON =
> PANEL = 0
> TITLE = 1
> TEXT = 1
> CLEAR = YES
> DEVICE = XW
> LUTFIL = upc_dem5.tbl
>
> Yet when I run it I get this error:
>
> "[IM 1] No image type entry for file ustopo_dem5.gini"
>
> I'm not sure what I am doing wrong here. Any recommedations would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> I assume that the "gini" file is in the correct format and doesn't need
> to be converted?
>
> Thanks
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
> Date: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:58 pm
> Subject: Re: Higher resolution topographic gempak sat files
>
> > Alan,
> >
> > I'll be out of the office next week for the AMS, but would be
> > happy to
> > work with you
> > more after I return.
> >
> > It would be possible for me to provide you with the topo to grid to
> > image programs,
> > but you would have to run my binaries to do that until your version of
> > GEMPAK is capable of handling larger grids (since I use the grid
> > navigation routines to handle the
> > transformation from lat/lon projection to other projections). So,
> > for a
> > quick start,
> > I provided a sample using the 5min dem data since it included
> > bathymetryas the image you are currently using does.
> >
> > I created a ~6km resolution GIF as a sample from the 5min dem data at:
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/chiz/gifs/topo_nam.gif
> >
> > You can download the gini file that created the image at:
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/chiz/gifs/ustopo_dem5.gini
> >
> > For GINI, I used the GOES7 satellite ID here since you probably cannot
> > remap an unused ID with your version of GEMPAK. The
> > $GEMTBL/sat/imgtyp.tbl entry to display this image is:
> > TOPO TOPO_DEM5 0 95 33 32768 1
> > upc_dem5.tbl
> >
> > You can download the color table for your $GEMTBL/luts directory here:
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/chiz/gifs/upc_dem5.tbl
> >
> > The GPMAP parameters to display the image as the GIF above is shown
> > below, where I've added:
> > BND = lakes/24
> > to fill in the lakes as water color (since the DEM data would be above
> > sea level and not blue there). You can set the GAREA smaller than dset
> > as necessary.
> >
> > GAREA = dset
> > PROJ = sat
> > SATFIL = ustopo_dem5.gini
> > BND = lakes/24
> > LUTFIL = default
> >
> > The 30 second data is great for smaller areas where you can take
> > advantage of the resolution, more therelater if you feed this is where
> > you want to go.
> >
> > Steve Chiswell
> > Unidata User Support
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 14:07 -0500, address@hidden wrote:
> > > Steve,
> > >
> > > It's hard to say just what kind of resolution that we need as I
> > am not
> > > sure what we are currently using. I think that maybe the one we
> > use is 5
> > > min. We have had it for at least 5 years.
> > >
> > > I really do not want this to be a lot of work for you. Is there
> > any way
> > > that we could run the grid-to-image conversion on the data so we
> > could> play around with various data sets to see what we like?
> > (That assumes it
> > > would run on our workstations, which run RHEL3 and RHEL4.) It
> > would be
> > > nice to have some background for general use that is better than
> > what we
> > > have now but also a much better background if we need to produce
> > much> higher quality images for publication.
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
> > > Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 12:43 pm
> > > Subject: Re: Higher resolution topographic gempak sat files
> > >
> > > > Alan,
> > > >
> > > > I have created both 30 second and 5 minute global topography
> > (dem)
> > > > datasets.
> > > > The 5 minute dem data has bathymetry, while the 30 second data
> > set
> > > > doesnot.
> > > >
> > > > I provide these as a grid
> > > > (http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/downloads/gempak/tables/)
> > > > for use with a program I call GDTOPO which allows users to
> > create a
> > > > subset for a Gempak grid file. However, it would be possible to
> > map
> > > > thegrid into an image to use as a background using the same
> > grid to
> > > > imageconversion that I do for our
> > > > radar composite images.
> > > >
> > > > If you can provide some information regarding the resolution
> > > > (pixel-->km) you
> > > > need, I can look into making some background images.
> > > >
> > > > Steve Chiswell
> > > > Unidata User Support
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 10:50 -0500, Alan Robson wrote:
> > > > > Hi Mr Chiswell,
> > > > >
> > > > > My name is Alan Robson and I work in the Development and
> > Training
> > > > Branch
> > > > > of the Hydrometeorological Precipitation Center in Camp
> > Springs,
> > > > > Maryland. I am not sure if you the right person to address
> > this
> > > > > request to and hope you will forward it to the appropriate
> > > > individual if
> > > > > you are not.
> > > > >
> > > > > We produce many meteorological products for our webpage (
> > > > > http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ ) that use a fairly low
> > resolution
> > > > > topographic gempak sat file as a background. This is a
> > sample
> > > > of one
> > > > > of our most popular products that gets very many webhits:
> > > > > http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/noaa/noaa.gif
> > > > >
> > > > > We are currently attempting to improve the appearance of our
> > > > products
> > > > > and need to find a higher resolution version of the
> > topographic
> > > > gempak
> > > > > satellite file to use as a background.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you help us or give me the name of someone who can?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Alan Robson
> > > > > HPC/NCEP
> > > > > Camp Springs, MD
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
> > > > Unidata
> > > >
> > --
> > Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
> > Unidata
> >
--
Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
Unidata