[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Higher resolution topographic gempak sat files


  • Subject: Re: Higher resolution topographic gempak sat files
  • Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:36:56 -0700

Alan,

The entry in imgtyp.tbl you have below has the wrong channel ID. It
should
be 32768  (not 32761). The number is channel 16 (which equates to
2**(16-1)).

The gini image is the same format as the remapped imagery that NESDIS
puts on NOAAPORT. I'm using the GOES-7 satellite ID (shouldn't get any
conflicts there)
and channel 16 which is outside the range of bands for GOES-7 as well.

Steve Chiswell
Unidata User Support


On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 09:51 -0500, address@hidden wrote:
> Steve,
> 
> I was able to provide to the requestor a 300 dpi copy of the chart in
> question with the old "low res" topo as they don't need the hi res for a
> while.
> 
> So now I am trying to play with it a bit and am stuck.
> 
> Here's what I did.
> 
> 1. Downloaded the ustopo_dem5.gini and upc_dem5.tbl from the links you
> provided.
> 
> 2. Then copied locally a copy of the imgtyp.tbl into the same directory
> I am running gpmap.
> 
> 3.  Next I added the following entry to that, per your recommendation:
> TOPO      TOPO_DEM5    0 95 33  32761 upc_dem5.tbl
> 
> 4. And finally this is what I have for entries in gpmap
>  MAP      = 1
>  MSCALE   = 0
>  GAREA    = dset
>  PROJ     = sat
>  SATFIL   = ustopo_dem5.gini
>  RADFIL   =  
>  IMCBAR   =  
>  LATLON   =  
>  PANEL    = 0
>  TITLE    = 1
>  TEXT     = 1
>  CLEAR    = YES
>  DEVICE   = XW
>  LUTFIL   = upc_dem5.tbl
> 
> Yet when I run it I get this error:
> 
> "[IM 1]  No image type entry for file ustopo_dem5.gini"
> 
> I'm not sure what I am doing wrong here. Any recommedations would be
> greatly appreciated.
> 
> I assume that the "gini" file is in the correct format and doesn't need
> to be converted?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
> Date: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:58 pm
> Subject: Re: Higher resolution topographic gempak sat files
> 
> > Alan,
> > 
> > I'll be out of the office next week for the AMS,  but would be 
> > happy to
> > work with you 
> > more after I return.
> > 
> > It would be possible for me to provide you with the topo to grid to
> > image programs,
> > but you would have to run my binaries to do that until your version of
> > GEMPAK is capable of handling larger grids (since I use the grid
> > navigation routines to handle the
> > transformation from lat/lon projection to other projections). So, 
> > for a
> > quick start,
> > I provided a sample using the 5min dem data since it included 
> > bathymetryas the image you are currently using does.
> > 
> > I created a ~6km resolution GIF as a sample from the 5min dem data at:
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/chiz/gifs/topo_nam.gif
> > 
> > You can download the gini file that created the image at:
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/chiz/gifs/ustopo_dem5.gini
> > 
> > For GINI, I used the GOES7 satellite ID here since you probably cannot
> > remap an unused ID with your version of GEMPAK. The
> > $GEMTBL/sat/imgtyp.tbl entry to display this image is:
> > TOPO                 TOPO_DEM5     0     95     33  32768      1
> > upc_dem5.tbl
> > 
> > You can download the color table for your $GEMTBL/luts directory here:
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/chiz/gifs/upc_dem5.tbl
> > 
> > The GPMAP parameters to display the image as the GIF above is shown
> > below, where I've added:
> > BND = lakes/24 
> > to fill in the lakes as water color (since the DEM data would be above
> > sea level and not blue there). You can set the GAREA smaller than dset
> > as necessary.
> > 
> > GAREA  = dset
> > PROJ       = sat
> > SATFIL   = ustopo_dem5.gini
> > BND        = lakes/24
> > LUTFIL   = default
> > 
> > The 30 second data is great for smaller areas where you can take
> > advantage of the resolution, more therelater if you feed this is where
> > you want to go.
> > 
> > Steve Chiswell
> > Unidata User Support
> > 
> > On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 14:07 -0500, address@hidden wrote:
> > > Steve,
> > > 
> > > It's hard to say just what kind of resolution that we need as I 
> > am not
> > > sure what we are currently using. I think that maybe the one we 
> > use is 5
> > > min. We have had it for at least 5 years.
> > > 
> > > I really do not want this to be a lot of work for you. Is there 
> > any way
> > > that we could run the grid-to-image conversion on the data so we 
> > could> play around with various data sets to see what we like? 
> > (That assumes it
> > > would run on our workstations, which run RHEL3 and RHEL4.) It 
> > would be
> > > nice to have some background for general use that is better than 
> > what we
> > > have now but also a much better background if we need to produce 
> > much> higher quality images for publication.
> > > 
> > > Alan
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
> > > Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 12:43 pm
> > > Subject: Re: Higher resolution topographic gempak sat files
> > > 
> > > > Alan,
> > > > 
> > > > I have created both 30 second and 5 minute global topography 
> > (dem) 
> > > > datasets.
> > > > The 5 minute dem data has bathymetry, while the 30 second data 
> > set 
> > > > doesnot.
> > > > 
> > > > I provide these as a grid
> > > > (http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/downloads/gempak/tables/)
> > > > for use with a program I call GDTOPO which allows users to 
> > create a
> > > > subset for a Gempak grid file. However, it would be possible to 
> > map 
> > > > thegrid into an image to use as a background using the same 
> > grid to 
> > > > imageconversion that I do for our
> > > > radar composite images.
> > > > 
> > > > If you can provide some information regarding the resolution
> > > > (pixel-->km) you
> > > > need, I can look into making some background images.
> > > > 
> > > > Steve Chiswell
> > > > Unidata User Support
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 10:50 -0500, Alan Robson wrote:
> > > > > Hi Mr Chiswell,
> > > > > 
> > > > > My name is Alan Robson and I work in the Development and 
> > Training 
> > > > Branch 
> > > > > of the Hydrometeorological Precipitation Center in Camp 
> > Springs, 
> > > > > Maryland.   I am not sure if you the right person to address 
> > this 
> > > > > request to and hope you will forward it to the appropriate 
> > > > individual if 
> > > > > you are not.
> > > > > 
> > > > > We produce many meteorological products for our webpage ( 
> > > > > http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ ) that use a fairly low 
> > resolution 
> > > > > topographic gempak sat file as a background.   This is a 
> > sample 
> > > > of one 
> > > > > of our most popular products that gets very many webhits:  
> > > > > http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/noaa/noaa.gif
> > > > > 
> > > > > We are currently attempting to improve the appearance of our 
> > > > products 
> > > > > and need to find a higher resolution version of the 
> > topographic 
> > > > gempak 
> > > > > satellite file to use as a background.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Can you help us or give me the name of someone who can?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > 
> > > > > Alan Robson
> > > > > HPC/NCEP
> > > > > Camp Springs, MD
> > > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
> > > > Unidata
> > > > 
> > -- 
> > Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
> > Unidata
> > 
-- 
Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
Unidata